Hall v. Apollo Group, Inc. et al

Filing 89

ORDER DENYING HALL'S DISCOVERY MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying 79 and 80 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

KRISLEE CARDINAL HALL,
Plaintiff,

12
v.

13
14

APOLLO GROUP, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

15
16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 5:14-cv-01404
ORDER DENYING HALL’S
DISCOVERY MOTIONS WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
(Re: Docket Nos. 79 and 80)

Before the court are two discovery motions from Plaintiff Krislee Cardinal Hall. 1 On
September 2, 2014, Judge Koh issued an order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss, granting

18
leave to Hall to amend the complaint by September 24, 2014, and staying discovery until Hall files
19
20

a complaint that can at least partially withstand a motion to dismiss. 2 In light of Judge Koh’s

21

order, the court DENIES Hall’s motions without prejudice to renewal after the presiding judge has

22

established that a sufficient complaint has been filed to warrant the lifting of the stay.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated: September 12, 2014
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

25
26
27

1

See Docket Nos. 79 and 80.

28

2

See Docket No. 86 at 11.

1
Case No. 5:14-cv-01404-LHK
ORDER DENYING HALL’S DISCOVERY MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE