Patel v. Gamboa et al

Filing 5

ORDER OF SERVICE; DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy of the complaint, all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon Defendants Dr. Lawrence Gamboa, Dr. John Dunlap, and Dr. Darren Bright at Salinas Valley State Prison, (P.O. Box 1050, Soledad, CA 93960). The Clerk shall also mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 10/20/2014. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/20/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

PAREN H. PATEL,
Plaintiff,

12

v.

13
14

LAWRENCE GAMBOA, et al.,
15

Defendants.
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 14-01512 EJD (PR)
ORDER OF SERVICE; DIRECTING
DEFENDANTS TO FILE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICE
REGARDING SUCH MOTION;
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

17
18

Plaintiff, a state prisoner at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), filed the

19

instant civil rights action in pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison medical

20

officials. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted in a

21

separate order.
DISCUSSION

22
23
24

A.

Standard of Review
A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a

25

prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a

26

governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify

27

any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state

28

a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who
Order of Service
P:\PRO-SE\EJD\CR.14\01512Patel_svc.wpd

1

is immune from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must,

2

however, be liberally construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696,

3

699 (9th Cir. 1988).
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential

4
5

elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was

6

violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the

7

color of state law. See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).

8

B.

9

Plaintiff’s Claims
Plaintiff claims that he was denied his Eighth Amendment right to adequate

medical care for chronic pain in his neck, shoulder, back and head pain stemming from

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

a shot to the back of his head in October 2011. Plaintiff claims that Defendants have

12

denied him a necessary MRI and appropriate pain medication to treat his condition.

13

Liberally construed, Plaintiff states a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim for

14

deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97,

15

104 (1976).
CONCLUSION

16
17

For the reasons stated above, the Court orders as follows:

18

1.

The Clerk of the Court shall mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for

19

Waiver of Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a

20

copy of the complaint, all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon

21

Defendants Dr. Lawrence Gamboa, Dr. John Dunlap, and Dr. Darren Bright at

22

Salinas Valley State Prison, (P.O. Box 1050, Soledad, CA 93960). The Clerk shall

23

also mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.

24

2.

Defendants are cautioned that Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil

25

Procedure requires them to cooperate in saving unnecessary costs of service of the

26

summons and the complaint. Pursuant to Rule 4, if Defendants, after being notified of

27

this action and asked by the Court, on behalf of Plaintiff, to waive service of the

28

summons, fail to do so, they will be required to bear the cost of such service unless
Order of Service
P:\PRO-SE\EJD\CR.14\01512Patel_svc.wpd

2

waived, this action will proceed as if Defendants had been served on the date that the

3

waiver is filed, except that pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(B), Defendants will not be

4

required to serve and file an answer before sixty (60) days from the day on which the

5

request for waiver was sent. (This allows a longer time to respond than would be

6

required if formal service of summons is necessary.) Defendants are asked to read the

7

statement set forth at the foot of the waiver form that more completely describes the

8

duties of the parties with regard to waiver of service of the summons. If service is

9

waived after the date provided in the Notice but before Defendants have been personally

10

served, the Answer shall be due sixty (60) days from the date on which the request for

11
For the Northern District of California

good cause shown for their failure to sign and return the waiver form. If service is

2

United States District Court

1

waiver was sent or twenty (20) days from the date the waiver form is filed, whichever

12

is later.

13

3.

No later than ninety (90) days from the date of this order, Defendants

14

shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion with respect to the

15

claims in the complaint found to be cognizable above.
a.

16

Any motion for summary judgment shall be supported by adequate

17

factual documentation and shall conform in all respects to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules

18

of Civil Procedure. Defendants are advised that summary judgment cannot be granted,

19

nor qualified immunity found, if material facts are in dispute. If any Defendant is of the

20

opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the

21

Court prior to the date the summary judgment motion is due.
b.

22

In the event Defendants file a motion for summary judgment,

23

the Ninth Circuit has held that Plaintiff must be concurrently provided the

24

appropriate warnings under Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 963 (9th Cir. 1998)

25

(en banc). See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 940 (9th Cir. 2012).

26

4.

Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the

27

Court and served on Defendants no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date

28

Defendants’ motion is filed.
Order of Service
P:\PRO-SE\EJD\CR.14\01512Patel_svc.wpd

3

1

Plaintiff is also advised to read Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

2

and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (holding party opposing summary

3

judgment must come forward with evidence showing triable issues of material fact on

4

every essential element of his claim). Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file an

5

opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment may be deemed to be a

6

consent by Plaintiff to the granting of the motion, and granting of judgment against

7

Plaintiff without a trial. See Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995) (per

8

curiam); Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 653 (9th Cir. 1994).

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

5.

Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after

Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.
6.

The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due.

No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.
7.

All communications by the Plaintiff with the Court must be served on

14

Defendants, or Defendants’ counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true

15

copy of the document to Defendants or Defendants’ counsel.

16

8.

Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil

17

Procedure. No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or

18

Local Rule 16-1 is required before the parties may conduct discovery.

19

9.

It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep

20

the court informed of any change of address and must comply with the court’s orders in

21

a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to

22

prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

23
24

10.

Extensions of time must be filed no later than the deadline sought to be

extended and must be accompanied by a showing of good cause.

25
26

DATED:

8/20/2014

EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

27
28
Order of Service
P:\PRO-SE\EJD\CR.14\01512Patel_svc.wpd

4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAREN H PATEL,

Case Number: CV14-01512 EJD

Plaintiff,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

v.
LAWRENCE GAMBOA, et al.,
Defendants.

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
8/21/2014

That on
, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the
attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)
hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into
an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Paren Hasmukhbhai Patel P-99858
Salinas Valley State Prison
P. O. Box 1050
Soledad, CA 93960
Dated:

8/20/2014
/s/

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk