Voss v. Sutardja et al

Filing 49

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/6/2014. (lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

LEE VOSS, on behalf of himself and all others )
similarly situated and derivatively on behalf of )
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., )
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SEHAT SUTARDJA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
SEBASTIANO D’ARRIGO, on behalf of
)
themselves and all others similarly situated and )
derivatively on behalf of MARVELL
)
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
SEHAT SUTARDJA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case Nos.: 14-CV-01581-LHK
14-CV-02523-LHK
14-CV-03214-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case Nos.: 14-CV-01581-LHK, 14-CV-02523-LHK, 14-CV-03214-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

)
JAMES DIBIASE and MARIE DIBIASE, on
)
behalf of himself and all others similarly situated )
and derivatively on behalf of MARVELL
)
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SEHAT SUTARDJA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Francis Bottini and Christopher Heffelfinger for Plaintiffs Voss and
D’Arrigo; Rusty Glenn for Plaintiffs James and Marie DiBiase
Defendants’ Attorneys: Harry Olivar; Valerie Roddy
A case management conference was held on August 6, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. A further case
management conference is set for November 20, 2014, at 1:30 p.m.
The Court GRANTED a Motion to Consolidate the DiBiase action (No. 14-3214) with the
Voss (No. 14-1581) and D’Arrigo (No. 14-2523) actions. Plaintiffs shall file a Consolidated
Amended Complaint by August 15, 2014.
The Court GRANTED Plaintiffs’ Motion to Appoint Francis Bottini of the law firm of
Bottini & Bottini, Inc. as lead counsel. Bornstein & Bornstein shall file a motion to withdraw as
counsel by August 8, 2014. Lead counsel shall assign work to authorized plaintiffs’ counsel in the
most efficient manner possible. All counsel shall bill their time contemporaneously. Lead counsel
shall review the bills monthly and strike any duplicative or inefficient time entries.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Defendants shall file a Motion to Dismiss by September 4, 2014. Plaintiffs’ Opposition is
due by October 16, 2014, and Defendants’ Reply is due by October 30, 2014. The Court will hold a
hearing on the Motion to Dismiss on November 20, 2014, at 1:30 p.m.
Discovery in this matter shall be stayed pending a ruling on Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
However, the parties shall exchange initial disclosures by August 29, 2014. In addition, Defendants
shall provide to Plaintiffs the trial transcripts and any publicly available exhibits from Carnegie
Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., No. 09-290 (W.D. Pa.), by August 29, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26

Dated: August 6, 2014

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

27
28
2
Case Nos.: 14-CV-01581-LHK, 14-CV-02523-LHK, 14-CV-03214-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER