Voss v. Sutardja et al

Filing 72

ORDER FOR A RESPONSE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/23/2015. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 LEE VOSS, SEBASTIANO D’ARRIGO, JAMES DIBIASE, and MARIE DIBIASE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and derivatively on behalf of MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., Case Nos.: 14-CV-01581-LHK 14-CV-02523-LHK 14-CV-03214-LHK ORDER FOR A RESPONSE Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 18 19 20 SEHAT SUTARDJA, JUERGEN GROMER, JOHN G. KASSAKIAN, ARTURO KRUEGER, RANDHIR THAKUR, PANTAS SUTARDJA, WEILI DAI, and DOES 1-20, Defendants, 21 22 23 24 – and – MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., Nominal Defendant. 25 26 In light of Plaintiffs’ request for voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice, ECF 27 No. 71, the Court hereby ORDERS Defendants to file a response by February 25, 2015, at 10:00 1 28 Case Nos.: 14-CV-01581-LHK; 14-CV-02523-LHK; 14-CV-03214-LHK ORDER FOR A RESPONSE 1 a.m. indicating whether Defendants oppose Plaintiffs’ request. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 6 Dated: February 23, 2015 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case Nos.: 14-CV-01581-LHK; 14-CV-02523-LHK; 14-CV-03214-LHK ORDER FOR A RESPONSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?