Voss v. Sutardja et al
Filing
72
ORDER FOR A RESPONSE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/23/2015. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
LEE VOSS, SEBASTIANO D’ARRIGO,
JAMES DIBIASE, and MARIE DIBIASE,
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated and derivatively on behalf
of MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP,
LTD.,
Case Nos.: 14-CV-01581-LHK
14-CV-02523-LHK
14-CV-03214-LHK
ORDER FOR A RESPONSE
Plaintiffs,
16
v.
17
18
19
20
SEHAT SUTARDJA, JUERGEN
GROMER, JOHN G. KASSAKIAN,
ARTURO KRUEGER, RANDHIR
THAKUR, PANTAS SUTARDJA, WEILI
DAI, and DOES 1-20,
Defendants,
21
22
23
24
– and –
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP,
LTD.,
Nominal Defendant.
25
26
In light of Plaintiffs’ request for voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice, ECF
27
No. 71, the Court hereby ORDERS Defendants to file a response by February 25, 2015, at 10:00
1
28
Case Nos.: 14-CV-01581-LHK; 14-CV-02523-LHK; 14-CV-03214-LHK
ORDER FOR A RESPONSE
1
a.m. indicating whether Defendants oppose Plaintiffs’ request.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
Dated: February 23, 2015
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case Nos.: 14-CV-01581-LHK; 14-CV-02523-LHK; 14-CV-03214-LHK
ORDER FOR A RESPONSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?