Fitness Anywhere LLC v. Woss Enterprises LLC
Filing
112
ORDER STRIKING OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE AND DECLARATIONS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/9/2016. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
5
FITNESS ANYWHERE LLC,
Case No. 14-cv-01725-BLF
Plaintiff,
6
v.
ORDER STRIKING OBJECTIONS TO
EVIDENCE AND DECLARATIONS
7
8
WOSS ENTERPRISES LLC,
[Re: ECF 111]
Defendant.
9
10
On February 9, 2016, Defendant Woss Enterprises LLC filed its opposition to Plaintiff
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Fitness Anywhere LLC’s motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF 111. Attached to the
13
opposition were three documents containing objections to the evidence, ECF 111-11, objections to
14
the declaration of Randy Hetrick, ECF 111-12, and objections to the declaration of Paul Zadoff,
15
ECF 111-13.
16
Defendant’s filing does not comply with the Northern District of California’s Civil Local
17
Rules. Under Civil L.R. 7-3(a), “[a]ny evidentiary and procedural objections to [a] motion must
18
be contained within the [opposition] brief or memorandum [and] such brief or memorandum may
19
not exceed 25 pages of text.” Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the objections to the evidence at
20
ECF 111-11, objections to the declaration of Randy Hetrick at ECF 111-12, and objections to the
21
declaration of Paul Zadoff at ECF 111-13. Defendant may file an amended opposition that
22
complies with the Northern District of California’s Civil Local Rules on or before February 16,
23
2016.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 9, 2016
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?