Reynolds v. Stoke et al
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/11/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:14-cv-01772 EJD
MARYLYNN REYNOLDS,
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
v.
PATRICK STOKES, et. al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15
16
/
On August 25, 2014, the court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing by September 9,
17
2014, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the
18
Complaint did not establish federal question or diversity jurisdiction. See Docket Item No. 9.
19
As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Order to Show Cause. Accordingly,
20
for the reasons previously explained, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of
21
subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk shall close this file.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: September 11, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:14-cv-01772 EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?