Reynolds v. Stoke et al

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/11/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:14-cv-01772 EJD MARYLYNN REYNOLDS, 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. PATRICK STOKES, et. al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 / On August 25, 2014, the court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing by September 9, 17 2014, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the 18 Complaint did not establish federal question or diversity jurisdiction. See Docket Item No. 9. 19 As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, 20 for the reasons previously explained, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of 21 subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk shall close this file. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: September 11, 2014 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:14-cv-01772 EJD ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?