Feitelson et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 44

ORDER Granting 43 Amended Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Google Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint and Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 1/15/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Motion Hearing set for 12/18/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 11/12/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Brian C. Rocca (SBN 221576)
[e-mail]
Sujal J. Shah (SBN 215230)
Susan J. Welch (SBN 232620)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.2286

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
John E. Schmidtlein (SBN 163520)
[e-mail]
Jonathan B. Pitt (pro hac vice)
James H. Weingarten (pro hac vice)
Benjamin M. Stoll (pro hac vice)
725 12th St NW
Washington DC 20005-3901
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.434.5029

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Hill B. Wellford (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jon R. Roellke (pro hac vice)
Gregory F. Wells (SBN 212419)
2020 K Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.373.6001
Attorneys for Defendant
Google Inc.

12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
17

GARY FEITELSON, a Kentucky resident, and
DANIEL MCKEE, an Iowa resident, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly situated,

18
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
20
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
21

No. 5:14-cv-02007 BLF
AMENDED STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
HEARING ON GOOGLE INC.’S
MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’
FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
(LOCAL RULE 6-2)

Defendant.
22

Judge:
Dept.

Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
Courtroom 3, 5th Floor

23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-02007 BLF
AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND CMC
(LOCAL RULE 6-2)
A/76514141.2

1

Plaintiffs Gary Feitelson and Daniel McKee on behalf of themselves and all others

2

similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) (together, “the Parties”)

3

jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order to continue the hearing on Google’s Motion to

4

Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint and the subsequent Case

5

Management Conference, presently scheduled for November 19, 2014 and December 11, 2014,

6

respectively.

7

WHEREAS, on August 11, 2014, the Court ordered that the hearing on Google’s motion

8

to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint would take place on November 20, 2014, and the

9

Initial Case Management Conference would take place on December 11, 2014. See Dkt. 33;

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

WHEREAS, on October 28, 2014, the Court ordered that the hearing on Google’s motion
to dismiss be rescheduled from November 20, 2014 to November 19, 2014. See Dkt. 40;
WHEREAS lead trial counsel for Google has a trial that conflicts with the presently
scheduled date of the hearing on Google’s motion to dismiss;
WHEREAS Google has not previously requested a change of date for the hearing on its
motion to dismiss;
WHEREAS Google has requested a change of dates for the hearing and Case

17

Management Conference to accommodate its counsel’s schedule, the Parties have met and

18

conferred, and reached agreement on an alternative hearing schedule, and also an alternative date

19

for the Case Management Conference.

20
21

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to,
and ask the Court to approve, the following:
The hearing on Google’s motion to dismiss shall be continued to December 18,

22

1.

23

2014 at 9:00 a.m.

24

2.

25

The Case Management Conference scheduled on December 11, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.

shall be continued until January 22, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.

26
27

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

28
1
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-02007 BLF
AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND CMC
(LOCAL RULE 6-2)
A/76514141.2

1

DATED: November 11, 2014

2

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

3
4

By:

5
6

/s/ Brian C. Rocca
Brian C. Rocca
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Google Inc.

7
8

DATED: November 11, 2014

9

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

10
11

By:

12
13
14

/s/ Robert F. Lopez
Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice)
Robert F. Lopez (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Gary Feitelson et al.

15
16
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

DATED: November 12, 2014

20
21

Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-02007 BLF
AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND CMC
(LOCAL RULE 6-2)
A/76514141.2