Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Software Tech
Filing
113
Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting 111 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (rmwlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
Case No. 5:14-cv-02140-RMW
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
SEAL
14
15
SOFTWARE TECH, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 111
Defendants.
16
17
Before the court is Adobe’s administrative motion to seal an exhibit in support of its
18
motion for default judgment. Dkt. No. 111. “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right
19
to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’”
20
Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v.
21
Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n. 7 (1978)). Accordingly, when considering a
22
sealing request, “a ‘strong presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.” Id. (quoting Foltz
23
v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). Parties seeking to seal
24
judicial records relating to dispositive motions bear the burden of overcoming the presumption
25
with “compelling reasons” that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies
26
favoring disclosure. Id. at 1178-79.
27
A protective order sealing the documents during discovery may reflect the court’s previous
1
28
5:14-cv-02140-RMW
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
RS
1
determination that good cause exists to keep the documents sealed, see Kamakana, 447 F.3d at
2
1179-80, but a blanket protective order that allows the parties to designate confidential documents
3
does not provide sufficient judicial scrutiny to determine whether each particular document should
4
remain sealed. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A) (“Reference to a stipulation or protective order that
5
allows a party to designate certain documents as confidential is not sufficient to establish that a
6
document, or portions thereof, are sealable.”).
7
In addition to making particularized showings of good cause, parties moving to seal
8
documents must comply with the procedures established by Civ. L.R. 79-5. Pursuant to Civ. L.R.
9
79-5(b), a sealing order is appropriate only upon a request that establishes the document is
“sealable,” or “privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
the law.” “The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material, and
12
must conform with Civil L.R. 79-5(d).” Civ. L.R. 79-5(b) (requiring the submitting party to attach
13
a “proposed order that is narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material” which “lists in table
14
format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed,” and an “unredacted version
15
of the document” that indicates “by highlighting or other clear method, the portions of the
16
document that have been omitted from the redacted version.”). “Within 4 days of the filing of the
17
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as
18
required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable.”
19
Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).
20
With these standards in mind, the courts rules on the instant motions as follows.
Motion to
Document to be Sealed
Ruling
Reason/Explanation
Seal
111
Adobe Sales and Profit
GRANTED Narrowly tailored to confidential
Spreadsheet (111-3)
business information
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 8, 2016
25
______________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
26
27
2
28
5:14-cv-02140-RMW
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?