V. et al v. City of Sunnyvale et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER 31 for Dismissal With Prejudice of All Claims as to Defendant City of Sunnyvale Only. City of Sunnyvale (a municipal corporation) Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/18/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876
Joanne Tran, State Bar No. 294402
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
The Waterfront Building
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone:
(415) 353-0999
Facsimile:
(415) 353-0990
gfox@bfesf.com
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SUNNYVALE
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
D.V., a minor, Successor-in-Interest for
Decedent JUAN CARLOS RUELAS, by and
through his Guardian Ad Litem Rosemary
Viramontes; JOSE RUELAS, an individual and
REBECA RUELAS, an individual,
Case No. CV14-02155 RMW
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL
CLAIMS AS TO DEFENDANT CITY OF
SUNNYVALE ONLY
Plaintiffs,
15
16
v.
17
CITY OF SUNNYVALE, a municipal
corporation; CITY OF SANTA CLARA; a
municipal corporation; COUNTY OF SANTA
CLARA, a municipal corporation, and DOES 150, inclusive,
18
19
20
Defendants.
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs D.V., a minor, Successor-in-Interest for
24
Decedent Juan Carlos Ruelas, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Rosemary Viramontes, Jose Ruelas
25
and Rebeca Ruelas, acting by and through their attorney Ben Nisenbaum, and Defendant City of
26
Sunnyvale, by and through its counsel of record, Gregory M. Fox (hereinafter “Parties”) as follows:
27
28
Plaintiffs, acting by and through their counsel of record, dismisses their complaint and all claims
1
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL
CLAIMS AS TO DEFENDANT CITY OF SUNNYVALE ONLY
V, et al. v. City of Sunnyvale, et al., USDC Northern Dist. Case No. 5:14-cv-02155 RMW
1
included therein with prejudice as to Defendant City of Sunnyvale only. The Parties agree that each
2
party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees, and further request that the Court Order this dismissal as
3
to the City of Sunnyvale only.
4
Co-defendants City of Santa Clara, acting by and through their counsel of record, Jon A.
5
Heaberlin, and County of Santa Clara, acting by and through their counsel of record, Michael C.
6
Serverian, have no objections to this Stipulation and hereby joins in this Stipulation.
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9
Dated: December 17, 2014
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
10
11
By:
12
13
14
/s/
Gregory M. Fox
Joanne Tran
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SUNNYVALE
15
16
17
DATED: December 17, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
18
By:
19
20
/s/
John L. Burris
Ben Nisenbaum
Attorneys for the Plaintiffs
21
22
DATED: December 17, 2014
RANKIN STOCK HEABERLIN
23
24
25
26
By:
/s/
Jon A. Heaberlin
Attorneys for the Defendants
CITY OF SANTA CLARA
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL
CLAIMS AS TO DEFENDANT CITY OF SUNNYVALE ONLY
V, et al. v. City of Sunnyvale, et al., USDC Northern Dist. Case No. 5:14-cv-02155 RMW
1
2
DATED: December 17, 2014
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
3
4
By:
5
6
/s/
Orry P. Korb
Michael C. Serverian
Attorneys for the Defendants
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
7
8
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
9
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a
10
conformed signature (“/s/”) within this E-filed document or been authorized by all counsel to show his or
11
her signature on this Stipulation as /s/.
12
Dated: December 17, 2014
13
By:
/s/
Joanne Tran
14
15
ORDER
16
17
18
19
20
Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that plaintiffs’ complaint and action herein is dismissed in full and with prejudice as to
defendant City of Sunnyvale only, each party to bear their own costs and fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
Dated: December ____, 2014
THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL
CLAIMS AS TO DEFENDANT CITY OF SUNNYVALE ONLY
V, et al. v. City of Sunnyvale, et al., USDC Northern Dist. Case No. 5:14-cv-02155 RMW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?