V. et al v. City of Sunnyvale et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER 36 for Dismissal With Prejudice of All Claims as to Defendant County of Santa Clara Only. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/16/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

ORRY P. KORB, County Counsel (S.B. #114399)
MICHAEL C. SERVERIAN, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #133203)
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor
San Jose, California 95110-1770
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

D.V., a minor, Successor-in-Interest for Decedent
JUAN CARLOS RUELAS, by and through his
12 Guardian ad Litem Rosemary Viramontes; JOSE
LUIS RUELAS, and REBECA RUELAS,

No. CV14-02155 RMW

11

13
14
15
16
17

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
ALL CLAIMS AS TO DEFENDANT
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ONLY

Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF SUNNYVALE, CITY OF SANTA
CLARA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, and
DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendants.

18
19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs D.V., a minor, Successor-in-

20

Interest for Decedent Juan Carlos Ruelas, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Rosemary

21

Viramontes, Jose Ruelas and Rebeca Ruelas, acting by and through their attorney Ben Nisenbaum,

22

and Defendant County of Santa Clara, by and through its counsel of record, Michael Serverian

23

(hereinafter “Parties”) as follows:

24

Plaintiffs, acting by and through their counsel of record, dismisses their complaint and all

25

claims included therein with prejudice as to Defendant County of Santa Clara only. The parties

26

agree that each party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees, and further request that the Court

27

Order this dismissal as to the County of Santa Clara only.

28

//
Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice
Of all Claims at to Defendant County of Santa Clara

1

CV14-02155 RMW

1
2
3
4
5

Co-defendant City of Santa Clara, acting by and through their counsel of record, Jon A.
Heaberlin has no objection to this Stipulation and hereby joins in this Stipulation.
I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures
indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORRY P. KORB
County Counsel

6
7
8

Dated: January 13, 2015

By:

/S/
MICHAEL C. SERVERIAN
Deputy County Counsel

9
10

.

Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

11
12

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

13

15

/S/
JOHN L. BURRIS
BEN NISENBAUM

16

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

14

Dated: January 13, 2015

By:

.

17

RANKIN STOCK HEABERLIN

18
19
20

Dated: January 13, 2015

By:

/S/
JON A. HEABERLIN

21

.

Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SANTA CLARA

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice
Of all Claims at to Defendant County of Santa Clara

2

CV14-02155 RMW

ORDER

1

Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

2
3

ORDERED that plaintiffs’ complaint and action herein is dismissed in full and with prejudice as to

4

Defendant County of Santa Clara only, each party to bear their own costs and fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: ____________________

__________________________________
HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Court Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1041490

28
Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice
Of all Claims at to Defendant County of Santa Clara

3

CV14-02155 RMW