Moore v. Apple Inc.

Filing 19

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING DEADLINES PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT filed by Adrienne Moore. (Katriel, Roy) (Filed on 8/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 4 ROY A. KATRIEL (CA SBN 265463) rak@katriellaw.com THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM 4225 Executive Square, Suite 600 La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: 858.242.5642 Facsimile: 858.430.3719 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Adrienne Moore 6 DAVID M. WALSH (CA SBN 120761) DWalsh@mofo.com KAI S. BARTOLOMEO (CA SBN 264033) KBartolomeo@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 707 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90017-3543 Telephone: 213.892.5200 Facsimile: 213.892.5454 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 14 TIFFANY CHEUNG (CA SBN 211497) TCheung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 15 Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc. 12 13 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 ADRIENNE MOORE, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. CV 14-2269 LHK CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 v. APPLE INC., Defendant. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING DEADLINES PERTAINING TO DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 25 [N.D. CAL. CIVIL L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2] 26 Hon. Lucy H. Koh Complaint Filed: May 15, 2014 Trial Date: None Set 27 28 Stip And [Proposed] Order To Amend Briefing Deadlines Re: Apple’s Mtn To Dismiss Moore v. Apple Inc., No. 5:14-cv-2269-LHK 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiff Adrienne Moore and Defendant 2 Apple Inc., through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate, subject to Court approval, as 3 follows: 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Complaint in this case on May 15, 2014; 5 WHEREAS, on June 6, 2014 and on July 21, 2014, the parties stipulated to allow Apple 6 7 additional time to respond to the Complaint until and including July 24, 2014; WHEREAS, on July 24, 2014, Apple timely filed a Motion to Dismiss Moore’s Class 8 Action Complaint, and noticed a hearing on the Motion for November 13, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.--the 9 then first available hearing date on the Court’s calendar; 10 11 12 WHEREAS, Moore’s Response to Apple’s Motion to Dismiss is due on or before August 7, 2014; WHEREAS, the parties have conferred regarding scheduling conflicts, including briefing 13 and court appearance obligations of Moore’s counsel, and have agreed to stipulate to extending 14 Plaintiff’s time to respond to Apple’s Motion and Apple’s time to reply; 15 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have telephonically met and conferred and agreed 16 upon an amended briefing schedule that would leave the hearing date on Apple’s motion 17 unchanged; 18 19 20 WHEREAS, Moore’s counsel has never sought any extension as to this motion or any other deadline in this action; Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED 21 by the parties that, subject to Court approval, the briefing schedule on Apple’s pending motion to 22 dismiss shall be modified as follows: 23 24 25 26 1. Moore’s Response to Apple’s Motion To Dismiss the Class Action Complaint shall be filed on or before August 21, 2014; 2. Apple’s Reply In Support Of Its Motion To Dismiss the Class Action Complaint Shall be filed on or before September 18, 2014; 27 28 1 1 3. The November 11, 2014 hearing date on Apple’s Motion To Dismiss shall remain on 2 calendar and unchanged, and there is no other deadline currently fixed by the Court in 3 this action that would be affected by this Stipulation. 4 5 Dated: August 6, 2014 6 7 DAVID M. WALSH TIFFANY CHEUNG KAI S. BARTOLOMEO MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 8 By: /s/ Tiffany Cheung Tiffany Cheung 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 11 12 Dated: August 6, 2014 13 ROY A. KATRIEL THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM 14 By: /s/ Roy A. Katriel ROY A. KATRIEL 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff ADRIENNE MOORE 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 Dated: ________________,2014 ________________________________ Hon. Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 Filer’s Attestation: I, Roy A. Katriel, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being 2 used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that 3 Tiffany Cheung has concurred in this filing. 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: August 6, 2014 /s/ Roy A. Katriel _________________________ ROY A. KATRIEL THE KATRIEL LAW Attorney for Plaintiff ADRIENNE MOORE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?