Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING 11 Unopposed Motion for Administrative Relief to Extend the Time by Which the American Bar Association Must Respond to the Complaint filed by American Bar Association. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/11/2014. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
THINK COMPUTER FOUNDATION, et
al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
11
v.
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES COURTS, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 14-cv-02396-BLF
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION'S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO THE COMPLAINT
[Re: Dkt. No. 11]
12
13
Before the Court is Defendant American Bar Association’s Unopposed Motion for
14
Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Finding good cause thereby, the Court
15
hereby grants Defendant’s Motion.
16
The Court notes that Defendant has filed this unopposed Motion, rather than merely
17
stipulating to an extension of time with opposing counsel, because of its belief that Plaintiff is
18
currently not represented by counsel. (See ECF 11 at 1) Defendant has sought and received
19
permission from Aaron Greenspan, whom Defendant believes is improperly representing Plaintiff
20
in the action by virtue of not being a licensed attorney in the State of California or elsewhere, to
21
extend its time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Id. at 2)
22
The American Bar Association’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby
23
extended from June 23, 2014, to the date upon which the remaining Defendants are required to
24
respond, which is currently no earlier than August 4, 2014.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 11, 2014
______________________________________
HON. BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?