Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al

Filing 45

SCHEDULING ORDER re 37 MOTION to Dismiss filed by American Bar Association, 36 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Richard W. Wieking, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Administrative Off ice of the United States Courts, Michel Ishakian, Wendell Skidgel, Claudia Wilken, 34 MOTION for Leave to File filed by Think Computer Corporation, Think Computer Foundation, Aaron J. Greenspan. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/21/14. (srmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2396

AARON GREENSPAN; THINK
COMPUTER FOUNDATION;
THINK COMPUTER
CORPORATION,

CASE NO. 14cv0396 JTM
SCHEDULING ORDER

Plaintiffs,
vs.
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES COURTS;
MICHEL ISHAKIAN, in her official
capacity on behalf of the
Administrative Office of the United
States Courts; WENDELL SKIDGEL,
in his official capacity on behalf of the
Administrative Office of the United
States Courts; UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA; RICHARD
WIEKING, in his official capacity on
behalf of the United States District
Court for the Northern District of
California, CLAUDIA WILKEN, in
her official capacity on behalf of the
Untied States District Court for the
Northern District of California; and
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION,
Defendants.
Pending before the court are three motions: Motion for Leave to file a Second

27 Amended Complaint; Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Administrative Office of
28 the United States Courts, Michel Ishakian and Wendell Skidgel, in their official
-1-

14cv2396

1 capacities on behalf of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, the
2 United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and Claudia
3 Wilken, in her official capacity on behalf of the United States District Court for the
4 Northern District of California; and Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant American
5 Bar Association. (Ct. Dkts. 34, 36, 37). The court sets a hearing date of October 6,
6 2014 at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall comply with the Northern District Local Rules in
7 filing oppositions and replies to the motions.1
8

Finally, the Court tentatively schedules oral argument on the motions. The Court

9 will notify the parties no later than by September 30, 2014 whether oral argument will
10 be entertained. In the event that the motions are not taken under submission without
11 oral argument, the parties may attend the hearing in person or, alternatively, participate
12 telephonically. The hearing will be conducted at the Edward J. Schwartz Federal
13 Courthouse, 221 W. Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101 in Courtroom 5D. Any party
14 who desires to appear and participate telephonically must contact chambers (619-55715 6627) three court days before the scheduled hearing to make appropriate arrangements.
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17 DATED: August 21, 2014
18

Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller
United States District Judge

19
20
21

cc:

All parties

22
23
24
25
1

The court notes that the motion to amend is proceeding on behalf of only
26 Plaintiff Aaron Greenspan. By separate order, entered concurrently with this order, the
Court issued an OSC to Plaintiffs Think Computer Foundation and Think Computer
27 Corporation re: failure to obtain legal representation. The court further notes that a
brief review of Plaintiffs’ motion to amend indicates limited opposition to its filing.
28 In the event there is no opposition to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint, the
court encourages the parties to file a stipulation permitting its filing.
-2-

14cv2396