Sammy Cuevas v. Peace Officer Research Association of California Legal Defense Fund et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUIGN DATE OF HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS/BENCH TRIAL (approving 31 ). Motion Hearing/Bench Trial set for 2/18/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 1/14/2016. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Teresa S. Renaker, Cal. Bar No. 187800
Margaret E. Hasselman, Cal. Bar No. 228529
RENAKER HASSELMAN LLP
235 Montgomery St., Suite 944
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Peace Officers Research Association
of California Legal Defense Fund
Steve M. Defilippis, SBN 117292
[e-mail]
Nicole A. Alvarado, SBN 262884
[e-mail]
PICONE & DEFILIPPIS, A P.L.C.
625 N. First St.
San Jose, CA 95112
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Sammy Cuevas

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16
17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN JOSE DIVISION

19

SAMMY CUEVAS,

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiff,
vs.
CAMPBELL PEACE OFFICER
ASSOCIATIONS’ PORAC LDF PLAN,
PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL
DEFENSE FUND, and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 5:14-CV-02540-BLF
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING DATE OF
HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE
MOTIONS/BENCH TRIAL

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE

CASE NO. 5:14-CV-02540-BLF
PAGE 1

1
2

WHEREAS, the Court set a Hearing on Dispositive Motions/Bench Trial in this matter
for February 12, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. (see Docket No. 23 at 1);

3

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has filed a dispositive motion for summary judgment pursuant to

4

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (Docket No. 25), and Defendant has filed a dispositive motion for judgment

5

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52 (Docket No. 28), both noticed for February 12, 2016;

6
7
8
9

WHEREAS, a scheduling conflict has arisen for February 12, 2016, for counsel for
Defendant;
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff does not object to a short continuance of the hearing
date on the cross-motions;

10

WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that the dispositive cross-motions can be resolved on

11

the papers and oral argument without the necessity of testimony or other activity differentiating

12

this hearing from any other dispositive motion hearing;

13
14
15

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties request that the Court continue the hearing on their
motions to the Court’s next available date.
SO STIPULATED.

16
17
18

Dated: January 14, 2016

RENAKER HASSELMAN LLP

19
20

By:

___________________________

21

Margaret E. Hasselman

22

Attorneys for Defendant

23
24

Dated: January 14, 2016

25

PICONE & DEFILIPPIS, A P.L.C.
By:

/s/ Nicole A. Alvarado

26

Nicole A. Alvarado

27

Attorneys for Plaintiff

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE

CASE NO. 5:14-CV-02540-BLF
PAGE 2

1
2

ATTESTATION

3

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

4

document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

5

_____________________________

6

Margaret E. Hasselman

7
8
[PROPOSED] ORDER

9
10
11

Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing, the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment and on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52 is
continued to

12
13

Dated:

_______________________________

14

BETH LABSON-FREEMAN

15

United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE

CASE NO. 5:14-CV-02540-BLF
PAGE 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DEF’S RULE 52 MOT. FOR JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 5:14-CV-02540-BLF
PAGE 1