Mjuan Carlos Martinez v. Trung Q. Le et al
Filing
36
VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on February 23, 2016 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 14-cv-02945-PSG
VERDICT FORM
v.
TRUNG Q. LE, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 14-cv-02945-PSG
VERDICT FORM
VERDICT FORM
1
2
3
4
5
When answering the following questions and filling out this verdict form, please follow the
directions provided throughout the form. Your answer to each question must be unanimous.
Some of the questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the jury
instructions. Please refer to the jury instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of
any legal term that appears in the questions below.
6
We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them
under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case.
7
FINDINGS ON LIABILITY
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1. Did Plaintiff Juan Carlos Martinez perform work for Defendants Trung Q. Le and
Letech Manufacturing, Inc.?
Yes _____ No _____
If you answered “Yes,” then answer the next question. If you answered “No,” stop
here, answer no further questions and proceed to page 5.
2. Did Mr. Martinez have an hourly wage rate of $10.00 per hour throughout his
employment with Defendants?
Yes _____ No _____
Proceed to the next question.
3. Did Mr. Martinez work overtime hours?
Yes _____ No _____
If you answered “Yes,” then answer the next question. If you answered “No,”
proceed to question 7.
4. Did Defendants know, or should Defendants have known, that Mr. Martinez had
worked overtime hours?
Yes _____ No _____
If you answered “Yes,” then answer the next question. If you answered “No,”
proceed to question 7.
5. Was Mr. Martinez paid at a rate lower than the legal overtime compensation rate for
any overtime hours that he worked for Defendants?
Yes _____ No _____
If you answered “Yes,” then answer the next question. If you answered “No,”
proceed to question 7.
27
28
2
Case No. 14-cv-02945-PSG
VERDICT FORM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
6. Did Defendants intentionally fail to pay Mr. Martinez overtime wages?
Yes _____ No _____
Proceed to the next question.
7. Did Mr. Martinez’ employment with Defendants end on September 6, 2013?
Yes _____ No _____
If you answered “Yes,” then answer the next question. If you answered “No,”
proceed to question 10.
8. Did Defendants fail to pay the full amount of wages due to Mr. Martinez by October 6,
2013?
Yes _____ No _____
If you answered “Yes,” then answer the next question. If you answered “No,”
proceed to question 10.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
9. Did Defendants willfully fail to pay these wages?
12
Yes _____ No _____
13
Proceed to the next question.
14
10. Did Defendants engage in an unfair business practice by violating state and federal
wage and hour laws?
15
16
17
Yes _____ No _____
Proceed to the next question.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 14-cv-02945-PSG
VERDICT FORM
FINDINGS ON DAMAGES
1
2
3
4
11. What are Mr. Martinez’ damages, if any?
$ _______________________
Overtime Wages Owed
Proceed to the next page.
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case No. 14-cv-02945-PSG
VERDICT FORM
1
Have the presiding juror sign and date this form.
2
3
Signed:
Presiding Juror
4
5
Dated:
6
7
After this verdict form has been signed and dated, notify the courtroom deputy that you are ready
to present your verdict in the courtroom.
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: February 23, 2016
26
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
5
Case No. 14-cv-02945-PSG
VERDICT FORM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?