DANIELA MARINACHE v. DANIEL LAWRENCE STERN, et al

Filing 56

Stipulation 55 and Order signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd.(hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2016)

Download PDF
5 TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555 HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196 Justice at Work Law Group 84 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 790 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 317-1100 Facsimile: (408) 351-0105 Tomas@JAWLawGroup.com Huy@JAWLawGroup.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DANIELA MARINACHE 1 2 3 4 E-Filed 1/8/16 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 DANIELA MARINACHE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. DANIEL LAWRENCE STERN; CHI WEN CHANG; and RAYMOND WU, Case No. 5:14-cv-3055 HRL REQUEST TO DISMISS RAYMOND WU WITHOUT PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff DANIELA MARINACHE by and through her attorney of record hereby requests that 20 RAYMOND WU be dismissed without prejudice for the failure to serve him with the Summons and 21 Complaint. A proposed Order is attached. 22 Dated: January 4, 2016 23 24 25 26 //s//Tomas E. Margain//s// Tomas E. Margain Huy Tran JUSTICE AT WORK LAW GROUP Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIELA MARINACHE 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 Based on Plaintiff’s request, the fact that the Summons and Complaint was not served and GOOD CAUSE shown the Court orders as follows: The Second Amended Complaint as to Defendant RAYMOND WU is dismissed 6 without prejudice. All docket and other calendar dates are hereby vacated and the clerk is 7 directed to close the file. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 1/6/16 DATED: _______________________ By: _______________________________________ THE HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?