DANIELA MARINACHE v. DANIEL LAWRENCE STERN, et al
Filing
56
Stipulation 55 and Order signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd.(hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2016)
5
TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555
HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196
Justice at Work Law Group
84 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 790
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 317-1100
Facsimile: (408) 351-0105
Tomas@JAWLawGroup.com
Huy@JAWLawGroup.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DANIELA MARINACHE
1
2
3
4
E-Filed 1/8/16
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
DANIELA MARINACHE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
DANIEL LAWRENCE STERN; CHI
WEN CHANG; and RAYMOND WU,
Case No. 5:14-cv-3055 HRL
REQUEST TO DISMISS RAYMOND WU
WITHOUT PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Defendants.
17
18
19
Plaintiff DANIELA MARINACHE by and through her attorney of record hereby requests that
20
RAYMOND WU be dismissed without prejudice for the failure to serve him with the Summons and
21
Complaint. A proposed Order is attached.
22
Dated: January 4, 2016
23
24
25
26
//s//Tomas E. Margain//s//
Tomas E. Margain
Huy Tran
JUSTICE AT WORK LAW GROUP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DANIELA MARINACHE
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH COURT TO RETAIN
JURISDICTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
Based on Plaintiff’s request, the fact that the Summons and Complaint was not served
and GOOD CAUSE shown the Court orders as follows:
The Second Amended Complaint as to Defendant RAYMOND WU is dismissed
6
without prejudice. All docket and other calendar dates are hereby vacated and the clerk is
7
directed to close the file.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
1/6/16
DATED: _______________________
By:
_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD
Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH COURT TO RETAIN
JURISDICTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?