Campbell v. Obama et al

Filing 27

ORDER REGARDING FAILURE TO E-FILE. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on August 25, 2014. (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/26/2014: #1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE) (ofr, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 KENNETH L. CAMPBELL, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:14-cv-03071-PSG ORDER REGARDING FAILURE TO E-FILE (Re: Docket Nos. 18, 19, and 20) This case is subject to Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”), pursuant to General Order 45, 18 Section VI of which requires that all documents in such a case be filed electronically. The docket 19 reflects that Docket Nos. 18, 19 and 20 were not filed electronically. 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED counsel for Defendant MP Shoreline Associates e-mail the above mentioned document to the court in Portable Document Format (“PDF”) format within 10 days, as an attachment in an e-mail message directed to the judge’s chamber's "PDF" email box 23 24 25 26 27 28 listed at (click on the “Judges” button and follow the procedure listed there). Do not e-file a document which has been previously filed on paper, as is the case with the above mentioned filing. All subsequent papers should be e-filed. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of monetary or other sanctions on a daily basis until the failure to comply with the General Order has been remedied. 1 Case No. 5:14-cv-03071-PSG ORDER REGARDING FAILURE TO E-FILE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?