Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation

Filing 185

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying 164 ; denying 167 ; denying 175 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SILICON LABORATORIES, INC.,

Case No. 14-cv-03227-PSG

Plaintiff,

8

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL

v.

9
10

(Re: Docket Nos. 164, 167, 175)

CRESTA TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
Before the court are three administrative motions to seal.1 Parties moving to seal

13
14

documents must comply with the procedures established by Civ. L.R. 79-5. “Within 4 days of the

15

filing of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a

16

declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material

17

is sealable.”2 The designating party has not filed such a declaration to support any of these

18

motions. All three motions to seal therefore are DENIED. The submitting party shall “file[] . . .

19

unredacted version[s] of the document[s] within 7 days.”3

20

SO ORDERED.

21

Dated: January 27, 2016
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
1

See Docket Nos. 164, 167, 175.

2

Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

3

Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(2).

25
26
27
28

1
Case No. 14-cv-03227-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL