Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation

Filing 185

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying 164 ; denying 167 ; denying 175 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SILICON LABORATORIES, INC., Case No. 14-cv-03227-PSG Plaintiff, 8 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL v. 9 10 (Re: Docket Nos. 164, 167, 175) CRESTA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 Before the court are three administrative motions to seal.1 Parties moving to seal 13 14 documents must comply with the procedures established by Civ. L.R. 79-5. “Within 4 days of the 15 filing of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a 16 declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material 17 is sealable.”2 The designating party has not filed such a declaration to support any of these 18 motions. All three motions to seal therefore are DENIED. The submitting party shall “file[] . . . 19 unredacted version[s] of the document[s] within 7 days.”3 20 SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: January 27, 2016 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 22 23 24 1 See Docket Nos. 164, 167, 175. 2 Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1). 3 Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(2). 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 14-cv-03227-PSG ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?