Cisco Systems Inc v. STMicroelectronics Inc
Filing
151
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte granting 146 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
CISCO SYSTEMS INC,
Case No. 5:14-cv-03236-RMW
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
SEAL
14
15
STMICROELECTRONICS INC, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 146
Defendants.
16
Before the court is Cisco’s administrative motion to seal three exhibits to Cisco’s February
17
18
1, 2016 letter brief on discovery. Because the information sought to be sealed was designated
19
confidential by STMicroelectronics S.r.l, ST Micro filed a declaration in support of sealing. Dkt.
20
No. 150. Applying the standards set forth in Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d
21
1092, 1096-98 (9th Cir. 2016), the court rules on the instant motion as follows:
22
23
Motion to Seal
146
Document to be Sealed
Ex. A (146-4)
146
Ex. B (146-6)
24
25
26
27
28
1
5:14-cv-03236-RMW
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
RS
Ruling
GRANTED as narrowly
tailored to confidential business
information.
GRANTED as narrowly
tailored to confidential business
information.
1
Motion to Seal
146
Document to be Sealed
Ex. C (146-8)
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 26, 2016
______________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ruling
GRANTED as narrowly
tailored to confidential business
information.
2
5:14-cv-03236-RMW
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?