Cisco Systems Inc v. STMicroelectronics Inc

Filing 151

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte granting 146 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 CISCO SYSTEMS INC, Case No. 5:14-cv-03236-RMW Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL 14 15 STMICROELECTRONICS INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 146 Defendants. 16 Before the court is Cisco’s administrative motion to seal three exhibits to Cisco’s February 17 18 1, 2016 letter brief on discovery. Because the information sought to be sealed was designated 19 confidential by STMicroelectronics S.r.l, ST Micro filed a declaration in support of sealing. Dkt. 20 No. 150. Applying the standards set forth in Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 21 1092, 1096-98 (9th Cir. 2016), the court rules on the instant motion as follows: 22 23 Motion to Seal 146 Document to be Sealed Ex. A (146-4) 146 Ex. B (146-6) 24 25 26 27 28 1 5:14-cv-03236-RMW ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL RS Ruling GRANTED as narrowly tailored to confidential business information. GRANTED as narrowly tailored to confidential business information. 1 Motion to Seal 146 Document to be Sealed Ex. C (146-8) 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 26, 2016 ______________________________________ Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ruling GRANTED as narrowly tailored to confidential business information. 2 5:14-cv-03236-RMW ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?