Cisco Systems Inc v. STMicroelectronics Inc

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER 18 Re: Scheduling, Motions terminated: 11 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by STMicroelectronics Inc, 13 MO TION to Strike DEFENDANT STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND, THIRD, FIFTH, AND SIXTH CAUSES OF ACTION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 425.16; MEMORANDUM O filed by STMicroelectronics Inc.. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/20/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Krista M. Enns (SBN: 206430) kenns@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 Attorneys for Plaintiff CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Winston & Strawn LLP 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, Case No. 5:14-cv-03236-RMW-HRL STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE SCHEDULING v. STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE SCHEDULING 1 Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc. 2 (“Defendant,” together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, 3 hereby stipulate as follows: 4 5 WHEREAS, on June 13, 2014, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendant in Santa Clara Superior Court; 6 7 WHEREAS, on July 17, 2014, Defendant removed the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division; 8 9 10 WHEREAS, on July 24, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss and a special motion to strike (“Motions”) in response to the Complaint with an agreed-upon hearing date of September 19, 2014; 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Winston & Strawn LLP 11 12 WHEREAS, the Court entered the Parties’ stipulation and proposed order extending the deadlines for the Oppositions and Replies; 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to amend the complaint; 14 WHEREAS, because Plaintiff is amending the complaint, it would be a waste of party and 15 judicial resources for the parties to continue briefing and for the Court to hear the pending Motions; 16 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the 17 Parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the Court should find that good cause 18 exists to enter an order that: 19 20 1. Defendant’s Motions shall be withdrawn without prejudice and the Motions shall be taken off calendar; 21 2. Plaintiff shall file its amended complaint no later than August 29, 2014; 22 3. Plaintiff’s amended complaint will not add any new parties or claims; and 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 STIPULATION AND ] ORDER RE SCHEDULING 1 4. The Parties shall agree on an appropriate deadline for Defendant to file its motions or 2 other pleadings in response to the amended complaint and an appropriate briefing schedule should 3 Defendant file any motions in response to the amended complaint. 4 5 Dated: August 18, 2014 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 6 By: 7 /s/ Krista M. Enns Krista M. Enns Attorneys for Plaintiff CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 8 9 10 Dated: August 18, 2014 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Winston & Strawn LLP 11 By: 12 /s/ Nicole Ryan Nicole Ryan Attorneys for Defendant STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. 13 14 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 19 20 LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION 21 22 I, Krista M. Enns, am the ECF User whose ID and password was used to file this 23 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING. In compliance with Local Rule 24 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that, counsel for Defendant, concurred in this filing. 25 26 Dated: August 18, 2014 By: /s/ Krista M. Enns Krista M. Enns 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE SCHEDULING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?