Cisco Systems Inc v. STMicroelectronics Inc

Filing 77

STIPULATION AND ORDER 76 to Extend Time to Submit Evidence in Support of Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/7/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Winston & Strawn LLP 10 Krista M. Enns (SBN: 206430) kenns@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 Dan K. Webb (pro hac vice) dwebb@winston.com J. Erik Connolly (pro hac vice) econnolly@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 35 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: (312) 558-5600 Facsimile: (312) 558-5700 Attorneys for Plaintiff CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 17 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 18 19 20 Plaintiff, v. STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., 21 Case No. 5:14-cv-03236-RMW-HRL JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(e) Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ISO PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(e) – CASE NO. 5:14-CV-03236-RMW-HRL SF:387927.1 1 Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) and Defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc. (“ST Micro” 2 together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as 3 follows: 4 WHEREAS, on April 1, 2014, Cisco filed its Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 73); 5 WHEREAS, the Third Amended Complaint references 24 exhibits, each of which was filed 6 with the Court (ECF Nos. 73-1 through 73-24); 7 WHEREAS, ST Micro’s position is that 6 of these exhibits (which have been filed in 8 redacted form)—Exhibit 1 (ECF No. 73-1), Exhibit 2 (ECF No. 73-2), Exhibit 3 (ECF No. 73-3), 9 Exhibit 4 (ECF No. 73-4), Exhibit 8 (ECF No. 73-8), and Exhibit 15 (ECF No. 73-15)—should be 10 filed under seal; 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Winston & Strawn LLP 11 12 13 WHEREAS, Cisco filed an administrative motion to seal each of these exhibits (ECF No. 74); WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e), ST Micro has until April 6, 2015 (because the 14 fourth day from Cisco’s April 1, 2015 filing falls on a weekend day) to file its declaration to support 15 the sealing; 16 17 18 19 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend ST Micro’s time to file a declaration as required by Local Rule 79-5(e) to April 10, 2015; NOW THEREFORE, Cisco and ST Micro stipulate as follows, subject to the Court’s approval: • 20 21 22 23 ST Micro shall have until April 10, 2015, to file and serve a declaration in support of sealing pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e). IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 3, 2015 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 24 By: 25 /s/Krista M. Enns Krista M. Enns Attorneys for Plaintiff CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ISO PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(e) – CASE NO. 5:14-CV-03236-RMW-HRL SF:387927.1 1 Dated: April 3, 2015 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 2 By: /s/ Sara Brody Sara B. Brody Attorneys for Defendant STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. 3 4 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: April __, 2015 9 Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Winston & Strawn LLP 11 LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION 12 13 I, Krista M. Enns, am the ECF User whose ID and password was used to file this JOINT 14 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE IN 15 SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO 16 LOCAL RULE 79-5(e). In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that, counsel for 17 Defendant, concurred in this filing. 18 19 Dated: April 3, 2015 By: /s/Krista M. Enns Krista M. Enns 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ISO PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(e) – CASE NO. 5:14-CV-03236-RMW-HRL SF:387927.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?