Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company v. 23andMe, Inc.

Filing 33

ORDER DENYING 31 PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/20/2014. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, 8 9 v. 10 23ANDME, INC., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY [Re: ECF 31] Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 14-cv-03286-BLF 12 13 In this declaratory relief action, Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company seeks a 14 declaration that it does not have a duty to defend its insured, Defendant 23andMe, Inc., with 15 respect to certain lawsuits, arbitration proceedings, and administrative proceedings (“underlying 16 litigation”). Defendant has filed a motion to stay the declaratory relief action pending resolution 17 of the underlying litigation; that motion has been fully briefed and is set for hearing on January 8, 18 2015. 19 Plaintiff’s administrative motion for leave to file a sur-reply is DENIED. The Court notes 20 that Plaintiff already has exceeded the number of pages permitted for an opposition brief. See Civ. 21 L. R. 7-3(a) (limiting opposition brief to twenty-five pages). Plaintiff has not demonstrated good 22 cause for yet more pages of briefing. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 20, 2014 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?