Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company v. 23andMe, Inc.
ORDER DENYING 31 PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/20/2014. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY
[Re: ECF 31]
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 14-cv-03286-BLF
In this declaratory relief action, Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company seeks a
declaration that it does not have a duty to defend its insured, Defendant 23andMe, Inc., with
respect to certain lawsuits, arbitration proceedings, and administrative proceedings (“underlying
litigation”). Defendant has filed a motion to stay the declaratory relief action pending resolution
of the underlying litigation; that motion has been fully briefed and is set for hearing on January 8,
Plaintiff’s administrative motion for leave to file a sur-reply is DENIED. The Court notes
that Plaintiff already has exceeded the number of pages permitted for an opposition brief. See Civ.
L. R. 7-3(a) (limiting opposition brief to twenty-five pages). Plaintiff has not demonstrated good
cause for yet more pages of briefing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 20, 2014
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?