Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company v. 23andMe, Inc.

Filing 33

ORDER DENYING 31 PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/20/2014. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN JOSE DIVISION

6
7

IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,

8
9

v.

10

23ANDME, INC.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY
[Re: ECF 31]

Defendant.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 14-cv-03286-BLF

12
13

In this declaratory relief action, Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company seeks a

14

declaration that it does not have a duty to defend its insured, Defendant 23andMe, Inc., with

15

respect to certain lawsuits, arbitration proceedings, and administrative proceedings (“underlying

16

litigation”). Defendant has filed a motion to stay the declaratory relief action pending resolution

17

of the underlying litigation; that motion has been fully briefed and is set for hearing on January 8,

18

2015.

19

Plaintiff’s administrative motion for leave to file a sur-reply is DENIED. The Court notes

20

that Plaintiff already has exceeded the number of pages permitted for an opposition brief. See Civ.

21

L. R. 7-3(a) (limiting opposition brief to twenty-five pages). Plaintiff has not demonstrated good

22

cause for yet more pages of briefing.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: October 20, 2014
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge