Chen v. LSI Corporation et al
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/4/2014. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2014)
7
8
R NIA
S
ER
FO
LI
Judge H
H
6
RT
5
. Lloyd
oward R
NO
4
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
A
3
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
2
Todd M. Friedman, Esq. (216752)
Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C.
324 S. Beverly Dr., #725
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone: (877) 206-4741
Fax: (866) 633-0228
tfriedman@AttorneysForConsumers.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNIT
ED
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
RICHARD CHEN, on behalf of) Case No. 14-cv-03396-HRL
himself and all others similarly situated, )
) NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY
Plaintiff(s)
) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
)
)
LSI CORPORATION; HEWLETT )
PACKARD COMPANY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
17
18
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff, pursuant to Federal Rule of
19
20
21
22
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses the entire case with
prejudice. Defendant has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor filed a
motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, this matter may be dismissed with
23
24
25
prejudice and without an Order of the Court.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th day of November, 2014.
26
27
28
By:
s/Todd M. Friedman
Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintiff
Notice of Dismissal - 1
1
Filed electronically on this 19th day of November 2014, with:
2
3
4
5
United States District Court CM/ECF system
And hereby served upon all parties
Notification sent on this 19th day of August, 2014, via the ECF system to:
6
7
8
Honorable Howard R. Lloyd
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
10
11
Michael J. Stortz (SBN 139386)
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
12
13
14
15
This 19th day of November 2014.
By: s/Todd M. Friedman
Todd M. Friedman
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Notice of Dismissal - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?