Chen v. LSI Corporation et al

Filing 23

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/4/2014. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2014)

Download PDF
7 8 R NIA S ER FO LI Judge H H 6 RT 5 . Lloyd oward R NO 4 D RDERE OO IT IS S A 3 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 2 Todd M. Friedman, Esq. (216752) Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 324 S. Beverly Dr., #725 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Phone: (877) 206-4741 Fax: (866) 633-0228 tfriedman@AttorneysForConsumers.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNIT ED 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 RICHARD CHEN, on behalf of) Case No. 14-cv-03396-HRL himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY Plaintiff(s) ) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE vs. ) ) LSI CORPORATION; HEWLETT ) PACKARD COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) 17 18 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff, pursuant to Federal Rule of 19 20 21 22 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses the entire case with prejudice. Defendant has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor filed a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, this matter may be dismissed with 23 24 25 prejudice and without an Order of the Court. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th day of November, 2014. 26 27 28 By: s/Todd M. Friedman Todd M. Friedman, Esq. Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff Notice of Dismissal - 1 1 Filed electronically on this 19th day of November 2014, with: 2 3 4 5 United States District Court CM/ECF system And hereby served upon all parties Notification sent on this 19th day of August, 2014, via the ECF system to: 6 7 8 Honorable Howard R. Lloyd United States District Court Northern District of California 9 10 11 Michael J. Stortz (SBN 139386) DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 15 This 19th day of November 2014. By: s/Todd M. Friedman Todd M. Friedman 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of Dismissal - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?