Harney v. Palo Alto Police Department et al
Filing
25
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on December 17, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
TYLER HARNEY,
13
14
15
Case No. 14-cv-03415-LHK
Plaintiff,
12
v.
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
PALO ALTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et
al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
An initial case management conference was held on December 17, 2014. A further case
management conference is set for March 18, 2015, at 2 p.m. The parties shall file a joint case
management statement by March 11, 2015. See Civil L.R. 16-9.
The Court set the following case schedule:
20
DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO AMEND OR ADD PARTIES: March 6, 2015
21
FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: September 30, 2015
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXPERT DISCOVERY:
Opening Reports: October 14, 2015
Rebuttal Reports: October 28, 2015
Close of Expert Discovery: November 4, 2015
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS shall be filed by November 19, 2015, and set for hearing no later than
December 17, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff is limited to one dispositive motion in the entire
case. Defendants City of Palo Alto and Police Chief Burns are limited to one joint
dispositive motion in the entire case. Defendants Santa Clara County and Sheriff Smith are
1
Case No.:14-cv-03415-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
limited to one joint dispositive motion in the entire case.
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: February 25, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.
2
JURY/COURT TRIAL: March 7, 2016, at 9 a.m. Trial is expected to last 7 days.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: December 17, 2014
6
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.:14-cv-03415-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?