Cumming v. Mohamed

Filing 22

Order Striking 21 Plaintiff's Filing. Plaintiff shall re-file her submission as a reply brief by no later than 5:00 p.m. on 9/17/2014. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 9/15/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2014)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN JOSE DIVISION

6
7

KARIN CUMMING,

Case No. 14-cv-03455-BLF

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S
FILING

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

HARSHAD CHERUVATHUR
MOHAMED, et al.,

[Re: ECF 21]

Defendants.

12
13

On September 12, 2014, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Supplemental Declaration and

14

Argument of Hugo N. Gerstl in Support of Motion to Remand Case to State Court.” ECF 21.

15

Although it was electronically filed as a noticed motion with attendant hearing and response/reply

16

dates, it appears that this document may actually be Plaintiff’s reply brief in support of her August

17

22, 2014 Motion to Remand. ECF 18. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s filing at ECF 21 is STRICKEN for

18

having been erroneously filed as a noticed motion. All dates associated with Plaintiff’s filing at

19

ECF 21 are VACATED. Plaintiff shall re-file her submission as a reply brief by no later than 5:00

20

pm on September 17, 2014.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 15, 2014
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge