Scott F Savage v. Citibank N.A. et al
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action. Re-noticed motion due by 11/14/2014. Response due by 12/4/2014. Reply due by 12/17/2014. Motion Hearing set for 2/5/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 11/13/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
GARY T. LAFAYETTE (State Bar No. 88666)
glafayette@lkclaw.com
APRIL SANTOS (State Bar No. 266367)
asantos@lkclaw.com
101 Mission Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 357-4600
Facsimile: (415) 357-4605
Attorneys for Defendants
CITIBANK, N.A., DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL
BANK, and FDS BANK
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(415) 357-4600
(415) 357-4605
12
FAX
STREET, SUITE 600
, CALIFORNIA 94105
101 MISSION
SAN FRANCISCO
KUMAGAI
&
LAFAYETTE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LLP
11
SCOTT F. SAVAGE,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
CITIBANK, N.A., DEPARTMENT STORES
NATIONAL BANK, FDS BANK,
16
Case No.: 5:14-CV-03633 BLF
Defendants.
17
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION AND TO STAY
ACTION
Judge:
Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
Complaint Filed: August 11, 2014
18
19
20
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiff SCOTT F. SAVAGE (“Plaintiff”)
21
and Defendants CITIBANK, N.A. (“Citibank”), DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK
22
(“DSNB”), and FDS Bank (“FDS”) ("Defendants")(collectively, the "Parties") through their
23
respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
24
WHEREAS on September 25, 2014, Defendants filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration
25
and to Stay Action with hearing originally set for November 4, 2014 before Magistrate Judge
26
Howard R. Lloyd;
27
28
WHEREAS on September 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Declination to Magistrate Judge
Jurisdiction;
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION (Case No.:
5:14-CV-03633 BLF)
1
1
WHEREAS on September 30, 2014, the Court issued an Order reassigning this matter to
2
the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman and instructing that all motions be re-noticed for hearing
3
before Judge Freeman [Dkt No. 18];
4
WHEREAS, pursuant to Judge Freeman’s Standing Order Re: Civil Cases, Defendants
5
contacted the Court to request a December 18, 2014 hearing date for Defendants’ Motion to
6
Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action on Judge Freeman’s Civil Law and Motion Calendar;
7
8
9
10
(415) 357-4600
(415) 357-4605
12
FAX
STREET, SUITE 600
, CALIFORNIA 94105
101 MISSION
SAN FRANCISCO
KUMAGAI
&
LAFAYETTE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS, Defendants were advised by Judge Freeman’s Calendar Clerk that the
earliest possible hearing date on Judge Freeman’s calendar was February 5, 2015;
WHEREAS, on October 31, 2014 Defendants received confirmation from the Court that
February 5, 2015 would be reserved for the hearing on Defendants’ Motion;
WHEREAS counsel for the Parties have met and conferred regarding a briefing schedule
on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action;
WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES
AS FOLLOWS:
Pursuant to Judge Freeman’s Standing Order Re Civil Cases, Defendants shall re-file and
serve their Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action on or before November 14, 2014;
Plaintiff shall file and serve his Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration
and to Stay Action on or before December 4, 2014;
Defendants shall file and serve their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’
Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action on or before December 17, 2014; and
Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration shall be heard on Thursday, February 5, 2015
at 9:00 a.m. before the Hon. Beth Labson Freeman in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
24
25
26
DATED: November 11, 2014
/s/ Ronald Wilcox
RONALD WILCOX
Attorney for Plaintiff SCOTT F. SAVAGE
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION (Case No.:
5:14-CV-03633 BLF)
1
DATED: November 11, 2014
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
2
/s/ April P. Santos
APRIL P. SANTOS
Attorneys for Defendants
CITIBANK, N.A., DEPARTMENT STORES
NATIONAL BANK, and FDS BANK
3
4
5
6
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
7
I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Ronald Wilcox, counsel for
8
Plaintiff, for the filing of this stipulation.
9
/s/April P. Santos
APRIL P. SANTOS
10
ORDER
(415) 357-4600
(415) 357-4605
12
FAX
STREET, SUITE 600
, CALIFORNIA 94105
101 MISSION
SAN FRANCISCO
KUMAGAI
&
LAFAYETTE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LLP
11
THE COURT, having considered the Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing,
13
orders as follows:
14
1.
Pursuant to Judge Freeman’s Standing Order Re Civil Cases, Defendants shall re-
15
file and serve their Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action on or before November 14,
16
2014 with a noticed hearing date of February 5, 2015;1
17
18
2.
Plaintiff shall file and serve his Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel
Arbitration and to Stay Action on or before December 4, 2014;
19
2.
Defendants shall file and serve their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to
20
Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action on or before December 17, 2014;
21
and
22
23
3.
February 5, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before the Hon. Beth Labson Freeman in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor.
24
25
The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is set for Thursday,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 13, 2014
____________________________________
HON. BETH LABSON FREEMAN
26
27
28
1
Defendant’s present Motion to Compel Arbitration, ECF 12, is hereby withdrawn.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION (Case No.:
5:14-CV-03633 BLF)
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?