Scott F Savage v. Citibank N.A. et al

Filing 22

ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action. Re-noticed motion due by 11/14/2014. Response due by 12/4/2014. Reply due by 12/17/2014. Motion Hearing set for 2/5/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 11/13/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP GARY T. LAFAYETTE (State Bar No. 88666) glafayette@lkclaw.com APRIL SANTOS (State Bar No. 266367) asantos@lkclaw.com 101 Mission Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 357-4600 Facsimile: (415) 357-4605 Attorneys for Defendants CITIBANK, N.A., DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK, and FDS BANK 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (415) 357-4600 (415) 357-4605 12 FAX STREET, SUITE 600 , CALIFORNIA 94105 101 MISSION SAN FRANCISCO KUMAGAI & LAFAYETTE ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP 11 SCOTT F. SAVAGE, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 CITIBANK, N.A., DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK, FDS BANK, 16 Case No.: 5:14-CV-03633 BLF Defendants. 17 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman Complaint Filed: August 11, 2014 18 19 20 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiff SCOTT F. SAVAGE (“Plaintiff”) 21 and Defendants CITIBANK, N.A. (“Citibank”), DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK 22 (“DSNB”), and FDS Bank (“FDS”) ("Defendants")(collectively, the "Parties") through their 23 respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 24 WHEREAS on September 25, 2014, Defendants filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration 25 and to Stay Action with hearing originally set for November 4, 2014 before Magistrate Judge 26 Howard R. Lloyd; 27 28 WHEREAS on September 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION (Case No.: 5:14-CV-03633 BLF) 1 1 WHEREAS on September 30, 2014, the Court issued an Order reassigning this matter to 2 the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman and instructing that all motions be re-noticed for hearing 3 before Judge Freeman [Dkt No. 18]; 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to Judge Freeman’s Standing Order Re: Civil Cases, Defendants 5 contacted the Court to request a December 18, 2014 hearing date for Defendants’ Motion to 6 Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action on Judge Freeman’s Civil Law and Motion Calendar; 7 8 9 10 (415) 357-4600 (415) 357-4605 12 FAX STREET, SUITE 600 , CALIFORNIA 94105 101 MISSION SAN FRANCISCO KUMAGAI & LAFAYETTE ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS, Defendants were advised by Judge Freeman’s Calendar Clerk that the earliest possible hearing date on Judge Freeman’s calendar was February 5, 2015; WHEREAS, on October 31, 2014 Defendants received confirmation from the Court that February 5, 2015 would be reserved for the hearing on Defendants’ Motion; WHEREAS counsel for the Parties have met and conferred regarding a briefing schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action; WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Judge Freeman’s Standing Order Re Civil Cases, Defendants shall re-file and serve their Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action on or before November 14, 2014; Plaintiff shall file and serve his Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action on or before December 4, 2014; Defendants shall file and serve their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action on or before December 17, 2014; and Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration shall be heard on Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before the Hon. Beth Labson Freeman in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 24 25 26 DATED: November 11, 2014 /s/ Ronald Wilcox RONALD WILCOX Attorney for Plaintiff SCOTT F. SAVAGE 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION (Case No.: 5:14-CV-03633 BLF) 1 DATED: November 11, 2014 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 2 /s/ April P. Santos APRIL P. SANTOS Attorneys for Defendants CITIBANK, N.A., DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK, and FDS BANK 3 4 5 6 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 7 I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Ronald Wilcox, counsel for 8 Plaintiff, for the filing of this stipulation. 9 /s/April P. Santos APRIL P. SANTOS 10 ORDER (415) 357-4600 (415) 357-4605 12 FAX STREET, SUITE 600 , CALIFORNIA 94105 101 MISSION SAN FRANCISCO KUMAGAI & LAFAYETTE ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP 11 THE COURT, having considered the Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing, 13 orders as follows: 14 1. Pursuant to Judge Freeman’s Standing Order Re Civil Cases, Defendants shall re- 15 file and serve their Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action on or before November 14, 16 2014 with a noticed hearing date of February 5, 2015;1 17 18 2. Plaintiff shall file and serve his Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action on or before December 4, 2014; 19 2. Defendants shall file and serve their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to 20 Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action on or before December 17, 2014; 21 and 22 23 3. February 5, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before the Hon. Beth Labson Freeman in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. 24 25 The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is set for Thursday, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 13, 2014 ____________________________________ HON. BETH LABSON FREEMAN 26 27 28 1 Defendant’s present Motion to Compel Arbitration, ECF 12, is hereby withdrawn. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION (Case No.: 5:14-CV-03633 BLF) 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?