Sarah Doty v. City of Santa Clara

Filing 14

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 2/25/2015. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No.: 14-CV-03739-LHK SARAH DOTY, v. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, Defendant. Plaintiff’s Attorney: Stanley Goff Defendants’ Attorneys: Rebecca Widen; Dylan Williams An initial case management conference was held on February 25, 2015. A further case management conference is set for June 10, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case management statement by June 3, 2015. The parties are referred to a settlement conference before U.S. Magistrate Judge MariaElena James. The deadline to complete mediation is May 26, 2015. The Court set the following case schedule: DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO AMEND OR ADD PARTIES: May 15, 2015 24 FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: September 1, 2015 25 EXPERT DISCOVERY: Opening Reports: September 18, 2015 Rebuttal Reports: October 2, 2015 Close of Expert Discovery: October 19, 2015 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 14-CV-03739-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 2 3 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS shall be filed by November 5, 2015, and set for hearing no later than December 17, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are limited to one dispositive motion per side in the entire case. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: February 18, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. JURY TRIAL: March 4, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. Trial is expected to last 5 days. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 25, 2015 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 14-CV-03739-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?