Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. v. Solid, Inc. et al
Filing
148
ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal re 137 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS
WIRELESS LTD.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
SOLID, INC. et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:14-cv-03750-PSG
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE
(Re: Docket No. 137)
Plaintiff Corning Optical Communications Wireless LTD and Defendants SOLiD, Inc. and
18
Reach Holdings, LLC have presented a dispute about where to produce foreign-based party
19
witnesses for deposition in this patent infringement case. In resolving such a dispute, the court
20
may consider:
21
(1) The parties’ convenience and relative hardships to attend the designated
location; (2) Cost of transportation and lost work to defendant; (3) Expense and
inconvenience to move voluminous documents; (4) Whether the parties’ counsel are
located in the forum district; (5) Whether the defendant is a large corporation whose
employees often travel; (6) Whether significant discovery disputes may arise and
judicial economy favors resolution by the forum court or other similar concerns;
and (7) Whether the parties’ claims and parties’ relationship are such that
appropriate adjustment of the equities favors a deposition site in the forum district. 1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Willis v. Mullins, Case No. 04-cv-06542, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35627, at *17-18 (E.D. Cal. Feb.
8, 2006).
1
Case No. 5:14-cv-03750-PSG
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?