Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. v. Solid, Inc. et al

Filing 148

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal re 137 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS LTD., Plaintiff, 13 14 v. SOLID, INC. et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:14-cv-03750-PSG ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE (Re: Docket No. 137) Plaintiff Corning Optical Communications Wireless LTD and Defendants SOLiD, Inc. and 18 Reach Holdings, LLC have presented a dispute about where to produce foreign-based party 19 witnesses for deposition in this patent infringement case. In resolving such a dispute, the court 20 may consider: 21 (1) The parties’ convenience and relative hardships to attend the designated location; (2) Cost of transportation and lost work to defendant; (3) Expense and inconvenience to move voluminous documents; (4) Whether the parties’ counsel are located in the forum district; (5) Whether the defendant is a large corporation whose employees often travel; (6) Whether significant discovery disputes may arise and judicial economy favors resolution by the forum court or other similar concerns; and (7) Whether the parties’ claims and parties’ relationship are such that appropriate adjustment of the equities favors a deposition site in the forum district. 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Willis v. Mullins, Case No. 04-cv-06542, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35627, at *17-18 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006). 1 Case No. 5:14-cv-03750-PSG ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?