Nathalie Thuy Van v. Language Line Services, Inc. et al
Filing
243
Referral to Federal Pro Se Program and Case Management Order. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/10/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
NATHALIE THUY VAN,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
REFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO SE
PROGRAM AND CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES, INC. and
LANGUAGE LINE LLC
Defendants.
17
18
Case No. 14-CV-03791-LHK
The pretrial conference in this case is set for June 30, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. ECF No. 192.
19
The parties shall follow the Court’s Jury Pretrial Standing Order, available at
20
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lhkorders. Each side may file up to four motions in limine of three
21
pages each. Each side may file oppositions to the motions in limine of three pages each. There
22
are no replies.
23
On May 2, 2016, the Court requested a statement from Plaintiff Nathalie Thuy Van
24
(“Plaintiff”) as to whether Plaintiff would be interested in a referral to the Federal Pro Se Program
25
for the possible appointment of pro bono counsel. ECF No. 240. Given Plaintiff’s positive
26
response, ECF No. 241, the Court hereby REFERS Plaintiff to the Federal Pro Se Program for
27
appointment of counsel. Plaintiff may meet with proposed pro bono counsel before the Court’s
1
28
Case No. 14-CV-03791-LHK
REFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO SE PROGRAM AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
formal appointment.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
Dated: May 10, 2016
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 14-CV-03791-LHK
REFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO SE PROGRAM AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?