Nathalie Thuy Van v. Language Line Services, Inc. et al

Filing 243

Referral to Federal Pro Se Program and Case Management Order. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/10/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 NATHALIE THUY VAN, 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. REFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO SE PROGRAM AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES, INC. and LANGUAGE LINE LLC Defendants. 17 18 Case No. 14-CV-03791-LHK The pretrial conference in this case is set for June 30, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. ECF No. 192. 19 The parties shall follow the Court’s Jury Pretrial Standing Order, available at 20 http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lhkorders. Each side may file up to four motions in limine of three 21 pages each. Each side may file oppositions to the motions in limine of three pages each. There 22 are no replies. 23 On May 2, 2016, the Court requested a statement from Plaintiff Nathalie Thuy Van 24 (“Plaintiff”) as to whether Plaintiff would be interested in a referral to the Federal Pro Se Program 25 for the possible appointment of pro bono counsel. ECF No. 240. Given Plaintiff’s positive 26 response, ECF No. 241, the Court hereby REFERS Plaintiff to the Federal Pro Se Program for 27 appointment of counsel. Plaintiff may meet with proposed pro bono counsel before the Court’s 1 28 Case No. 14-CV-03791-LHK REFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO SE PROGRAM AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 formal appointment. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 6 Dated: May 10, 2016 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 14-CV-03791-LHK REFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO SE PROGRAM AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?