Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filing 198

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on January 21, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER v. DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG INC., et al., Defendants. 17 18 Case No. 14-CV-04062-LHK ROBERT A. NITSCH, et al., Attorney for Plaintiffs: Daniel Small and Brent Johnson Attorneys for Defendants Disney, Pixar, Lucasfilm, and Two Pic MC (formerly known as ImageMovers Digital): Robert Van Nest and Cortlin Lannin Attorneys for the Sony Defendants: Stephen Bomse and David Goldstein Attorneys for Defendant DreamWorks Animation: Rod Stone and Shannon Mader Attorney for Defendant Blue Sky Studios: John Schmidtlein and Jonathan Pitt A case management conference was held on January 21, 2016. The Court amended the case schedule as follows: 24 Scheduled Event Date 25 Further CMC March 23, 2016 at 2 p.m. Class Certification briefing Motion: February 1, 2016 Opposition: March 24, 2016 Reply: April 14, 2016 26 27 28 1 Case No. 14-CV-04062-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Class Certification hearing May 12, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. Fact discovery cutoff October 14, 2016 3 Opening expert reports Rebuttal expert reports November 16, 2016 December 21, 2016 4 Close of expert discovery January 31, 2017 Motions for Summary Judgment and Daubert Motions Hearing on MSJ and Daubert Motions Filed no later than February 27, 2017 1 2 5 6 7 March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: January 21, 2016 10 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 14-CV-04062-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?