Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al
Filing
198
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on January 21, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
19
20
21
22
23
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
v.
DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG INC.,
et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Case No. 14-CV-04062-LHK
ROBERT A. NITSCH, et al.,
Attorney for Plaintiffs: Daniel Small and Brent Johnson
Attorneys for Defendants Disney, Pixar, Lucasfilm, and Two Pic MC (formerly known as
ImageMovers Digital): Robert Van Nest and Cortlin Lannin
Attorneys for the Sony Defendants: Stephen Bomse and David Goldstein
Attorneys for Defendant DreamWorks Animation: Rod Stone and Shannon Mader
Attorney for Defendant Blue Sky Studios: John Schmidtlein and Jonathan Pitt
A case management conference was held on January 21, 2016.
The Court amended the case schedule as follows:
24
Scheduled Event
Date
25
Further CMC
March 23, 2016 at 2 p.m.
Class Certification briefing
Motion: February 1, 2016
Opposition: March 24, 2016
Reply: April 14, 2016
26
27
28
1
Case No. 14-CV-04062-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Class Certification hearing
May 12, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.
Fact discovery cutoff
October 14, 2016
3
Opening expert reports
Rebuttal expert reports
November 16, 2016
December 21, 2016
4
Close of expert discovery
January 31, 2017
Motions for Summary Judgment and Daubert
Motions
Hearing on MSJ and Daubert Motions
Filed no later than February 27, 2017
1
2
5
6
7
March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: January 21, 2016
10
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 14-CV-04062-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?