Gay v. State of California et al
Filing
10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the foregoing reasons, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to filing as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Clerk shall enclose two copies of the court's form petition with a copy of this order to Plaintiff. The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions and close the case. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/15/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KENNETH EARL GAY,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
No. C 14-04088 EJD (PR)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner at San Quentin State Prisoner, filed the instant civil rights
18
19
action in pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in
20
forma pauperis will be granted in a separate written order.
21
DISCUSSION
22
23
A.
Standard of Review
A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a
24
25
prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a
26
27
1
28
The matter was transferred to this Court from the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia for lack of jurisdiction. (See Docket No. 5.)
Dismissal
P:\PRO-SE\EJD\CR.14\04088Gay_dsm.wpd
1
1
governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify
2
any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a
3
claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is
4
immune from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must, however, be
5
liberally construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.
6
1988).
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential
7
8
elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was
9
violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the
10
color of state law. See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
11
B.
Plaintiff’s Claims
12
Plaintiff identifies the State of California as the named defendant as “‘All State
13
Government Agents’ act under color of authority vested by the sovereignty contained
14
within State of California.” (Compl. at 1.) Plaintiff states that the matter should be
15
served upon, but not limited to, Governor Edmund Jerry Brown and the Attorney General
16
Kamala Harris. (Id.) Plaintiff alleges that he is in custody for a capital case “in violation
17
of the United States Constitution, Statutory Laws and Treaties of the United States.” (Id.
18
at 2.) Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages. (Id. at 56-58.)
19
The Eleventh Amendment bars from the federal courts suits against a state by its
20
own citizens, citizens of another state or citizens or subjects of any foreign state.
21
Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 237-38 (1985); Alabama v. Pugh, 438
22
U.S. 781, 782 (1978); Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 676-77 (1974). “A state waives
23
its Eleventh Amendment Immunity if it ‘unequivocally evidence[s its] intention to subject
24
itself to the jurisdiction of the federal court.’” Johnson v. Rancho Santiago Comm. Coll.
25
Dist., 623 F.3d 1011, 1021 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Hill v. Blind Indus. & Servs. Of Md.,
26
179 F.3d 754, 758 (9th Cir. 1999)). Unless a state has waived its Eleventh Amendment
27
immunity or Congress has overridden it, a state cannot be sued regardless of the relief
28
sought. Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 167 n.14 (1985) (citing Alabama v. Pugh,
Dismissal
P:\PRO-SE\EJD\CR.14\04088Gay_dsm.wpd
2
1
438 U.S. 781 (1978)); Confederated Tribes & Bands v. Locke, 176 F.3d 467, 469 (9th
2
Cir. 1999). Here, no such waiver is evident. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s civil action for
3
damages against the State of California and its agents must be DISMISSED as barred by
4
the Eleventh Amendment.
5
Furthermore, to the extent that Plaintiff is seeking equitable relief from his capital
6
sentence, habeas is the “exclusive remedy” for the prisoner who seeks “‘immediate or
7
speedier release’” from confinement. Skinner v. Switzer, 131 S. Ct. 1289, 1293 (2011)
8
(quoting Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005)); see Calderon v. Ashmus, 523
9
U.S. 740, 747 (1998); Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 648 (1997); Preiser v.
10
Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). Challenges implicating the fact or duration of
11
confinement must be brought through a habeas petition. Docken v. Chase, 393 F.3d
12
1024, 1026 (9th Cir. 2004). A civil rights complaint seeking habeas relief should be
13
dismissed without prejudice to bringing it as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See
14
Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa, 49 F.3d 583, 586 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, this action
15
is DISMISSED without prejudice.
16
17
CONCLUSION
18
For the foregoing reasons, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to
19
filing as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Clerk shall enclose two copies of the
20
court’s form petition with a copy of this order to Plaintiff.
21
The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions and close the case.
22
23
DATED:
12/15/2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
Dismissal
P:\PRO-SE\EJD\CR.14\04088Gay_dsm.wpd
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KENNETH EARL GAY,
Case Number: CV14-04088 EJD
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
12/16/2014
That on
, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the
attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)
hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into
an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Kenneth Earl Gay D-15601
San Quentin State Prison
San Quentin, CA 94974
Dated:
12/16/2014
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?