Loumena v. Kennedy et al

Filing 20

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on February 4, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACK LOUMENA, Case No. 14-cv-04165-LHK United States District Court Northern District of California Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 PAMELA KENNEDY, et al., Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Re: Dkt. No. 3 15 16 Plaintiff Jack Loumena filed a complaint in this Court on September 16, 2014. ECF No. 1. 17 On November 3, 2014, defendants Walter Hammon and Travis Krepelka filed a Motion to 18 Dismiss and Request for Judicial Notice, arguing that Plaintiff’s lawsuit fails to state a claim under 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and is barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. ECF Nos. 3, 5. Pursuant to Civil 20 Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss was due on November 17, 21 2014.1 As of today, February 5, 2015, Plaintiff has not filed an Opposition or Statement of 22 Nonopposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 23 24 The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. This Order does not authorize Plaintiff to file an untimely Opposition to 25 26 27 28 1 The Court renoticed the motion on November 20, 2014, after this case was reassigned to the undersigned. ECF No. 19. The hearing on the motion was renoticed for March 12, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. Id. The briefing schedule, however, remained unchanged. Id. 1 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has until February 18, 2015, to file a written response to 2 this Order to Show Cause. 3 4 Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this Order will result in dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2015 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?