ParkView Edge Properities, LLC v. Reeher et al

Filing 12

ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED WITH REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT CASE BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION re 8 Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on October 28, 2014 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 PARKVIEW EDGE PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. WILLIAM TERRY REEHER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:14-cv-04210-PSG ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED WITH REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT CASE BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (Re: Docket No. 8) Before the court is Plaintiff ParkView Edge Properties LLC’s motion to remand this action to recover possession of real property to Santa Clara County Superior Court for lack of subject 18 matter jurisdiction. Defendants William Terry Reefer and Steven Shawn Reeher did not file an 19 20 opposition. 1 The court held a hearing on the motion earlier today—only ParkView’s counsel 21 appeared. 2 After considering the arguments, the court ORDERS the case be reassigned to a district 22 judge with the recommendation that the case be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 3 23 24 1 See Docket No. 10. 25 2 See Docket No. 11. 26 3 27 28 The undersigned is ordering reassignment to a district judge and issuing a report and recommendation because, absent consent of all parties, a magistrate judge does not have authority to make case-dispositive rulings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (authorizing magistrate judges to submit “findings of fact and recommendations” to the district judge); Tripati v. Rison, 847 F.2d 548, 1 Case No. 5:14-cv-04210-PSG ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED WITH REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT CASE BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?