Lujano-Arreguin v. Holder, Jr.

Filing 18

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on December 11, 2015 (psglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

RAYMUNDO LUJANO-ARREGUIN,

8

Plaintiff,

10

ERIC H HOLDER, JR.,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

14
15
16
17

JUDGMENT

v.

9

13

Case No. 14-cv-04249-PSG

On April 21, 2015, the court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss.1 In so doing, the
court granted Plaintiff Raymundo Lujano-Arreguin 21 days to amend his complaint.2 Because the
time for amendment has long since passed and Lujano-Arreguin has not filed any amended
pleading, the court enters judgment in favor of Defendants.3 The Clerk shall close the file.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 11, 2015

18

_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

See Docket No. 17.

2

See id. at 4.

3

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(b)(1)(C) (“[U]nless the court orders otherwise, the clerk must, without
awaiting the court’s direction, promptly prepare, sign and enter the judgment when . . . the court
denies all relief.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(d) (“A party may request that judgment be set out in a
separate document as required by Rule 58(a).”); cf. Adams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No.
13-cv-5164, 2015 WL 1434599, at *6 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2015); Jones v. Masteranglo, Case No.
06-cv-0490, 2007 WL 2212083, at *6 (N.D. Cal. July 30, 2007).
1
Case No. 14-cv-04249-PSG
JUDGMENT