Max Sound Corporation, et al v. Google, Inc., et al

Filing 105

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME. The hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Stay (Docket Item No. 100) is ADVANCED from December 10, 2015, to 9:00 a.m. on November 5, 2015. All deadlines contained in th e Case Management Order filed on May 14, 2015 (Docket Item No. 79) are STAYED pending further order of the court. The Interim Case Management Conference scheduled for September 17, 2015, is VACATED. In light of these orders, the administrative motion to shorten time is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/3/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MAX SOUND CORPORATION, Case No. 5:14-cv-04412-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME v. 10 11 GOOGLE, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 102 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 17 Having reviewed Defendants’ unopposed administrative motion to shorten time (Docket Item No. 102), the court orders as follows: 1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Stay (Docket Item No. 100) is ADVANCED from December 10, 2015, to 9:00 a.m. on November 5, 2015. 2. All deadlines contained in the Case Management Order filed on May 14, 2015 18 (Docket Item No. 79) are STAYED pending further order of the court. The Interim Case 19 Management Conference scheduled for September 17, 2015, is VACATED. 20 21 3. In light of these orders, the administrative motion to shorten time is DENIED AS MOOT. 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 3, 2015 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:14-cv-04412-EJD ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?