Max Sound Corporation, et al v. Google, Inc., et al
Filing
105
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME. The hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Stay (Docket Item No. 100) is ADVANCED from December 10, 2015, to 9:00 a.m. on November 5, 2015. All deadlines contained in th e Case Management Order filed on May 14, 2015 (Docket Item No. 79) are STAYED pending further order of the court. The Interim Case Management Conference scheduled for September 17, 2015, is VACATED. In light of these orders, the administrative motion to shorten time is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/3/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
MAX SOUND CORPORATION,
Case No. 5:14-cv-04412-EJD
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME
v.
10
11
GOOGLE, INC., et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 102
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
16
17
Having reviewed Defendants’ unopposed administrative motion to shorten time (Docket
Item No. 102), the court orders as follows:
1.
The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Stay (Docket Item No. 100) is
ADVANCED from December 10, 2015, to 9:00 a.m. on November 5, 2015.
2.
All deadlines contained in the Case Management Order filed on May 14, 2015
18
(Docket Item No. 79) are STAYED pending further order of the court. The Interim Case
19
Management Conference scheduled for September 17, 2015, is VACATED.
20
21
3.
In light of these orders, the administrative motion to shorten time is DENIED AS
MOOT.
22
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 3, 2015
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:14-cv-04412-EJD
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?