Choose Energy, Inc. v. American Petroleum Institute

Filing 66

ORDER DENYING-AS-MOOT LEAVE TO AMEND STATE LAW CLAIMS re 64 , 65 Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 1, 2015 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 CHOOSE ENERGY, INC., Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, Defendant. 15 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:14-cv-04557-PSG ORDER DENYING-AS-MOOT LEAVE TO AMEND STATE LAW CLAIMS (Re: Docket Nos. 64, 65) Last month, this court granted Defendant American Petroleum Institute’s motion to dismiss and motion to strike. 1 The court further granted Plaintiff Choose Energy, Inc. leave to amend its 18 federal Lanham Act claims. But with questions as to whether leave to amend is appropriate after 19 20 an anti-SLAPP motion to strike is granted in light of Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)’s liberal approach to 21 amendment, the court ordered the parties to further brief the issue. In light of Choose Energy’s 22 representation that it does not seek to amend its state law claims, the inquiry is no longer necessary. 23 24 25 The court DENIES-AS-MOOT leave to amend the state law claims. Choose Energy shall file any amended complaint within seven days. To accommodate any Choose Energy amended pleading, the court reschedules the initial case management conference to May 19, 2015 at 26 10:00 AM. 27 28 1 See Docket No. 63. 1 Case No. 5:14-cv-04557-PSG ORDER DENYING-AS-MOOT LEAVE TO AMEND STATE LAW CLAIMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?