Garrison v. Oracle Corporation

Filing 52

ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal denying 45 without prejudice. (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 GREG GARRISON, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 v. ORACLE CORPORATION, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 5:14-cv-04592-LHK ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL (Re: Docket No. 45) Before the court is Plaintiff Greg Garrison’s administrative motion to file under seal Exhibit B to the Tyler J. Belong Declaration filed in support of Garrison’s motion to compel further initial disclosures from Defendant Oracle Corporation. Consistent with Civil L. R. 79-5, the motion is 22 DENIED without prejudice for the following reasons: 23 24 25 26 1. The documents offered in the administrative motion to file under seal contain unexplained highlighting. 2. The portions to be sealed are not highlighted in the unredacted submission. 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:14-cv-4592-LHK ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL 1 3. The proposed order does not list in table format each narrowly-tailored portion sought to be 2 sealed. 3 The requesting party is free to resubmit an error-free administrative motion to file under 4 5 6 seal no later than March 20, 2015. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 17, 2015 7 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 5:14-cv-4592-LHK ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?