Picard v. ABC Legal Services, Inc. et al
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER 23 to Continue Case Management Conference: Case Management Conference set for 3/27/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/6/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575)
Raeon R. Roulston (SBN 255622)
CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.
12 South First Street, Suite 1014
San Jose, California 95113-2418
Telephone Number: (408) 294-6100
Facsimile Number: (408) 294-6190
Email Address: fred.schwinn@sjconsumerlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DEREK BRANDON PICARD
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
10
DEREK BRANDON PICARD,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
15
16
17
Defendants.
18
20
21
STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND [] OR ER
ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC., a
Washington corporation, MARCOS
ANTONIO TEJADA, individually and in his
official capacity; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
14
19
Case No. 5:14-CV-04618-RMW-HRL
The parties in the above-entitled action hereby submit this Stipulation and Joint Request to
Continue Case Management Conference regarding the Case Management Conference scheduled on
March 13, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. In support of their request, the parties state as follows:
22
1.
23
this matter for March 6, 2015.1
24
2.
25
26
27
28
On December 10, 2014, the Court set the initial Case Management Conference in
The firm Consumer Law Center, Inc., counsel for record for Plaintiff, employs two
attorneys – Fred W. Schwinn, and Raeon R. Roulston. Lead counsel, Mr. Schwinn, will be traveling
out of the state on a previously-scheduled vacation from March 6, 2015, to March 20, 2015. Thus, his
1
Doc. 16.
-1STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 5:14-CV-04618-RMW-HRL
1
associate, Mr. Roulston, was assigned to appear for Plaintiff at the initial Case Management Conference
2
in this matter, which was originally scheduled on March 6, 2015, at 10:30 a.m.
3
4
5
3.
Thereafter, on February 20, 2015, the Court, of its own accord, continued the said
Case Management Conference to March 13, 2015.2
4.
6
Mr. Roulston is also scheduled to attend a Mediation on March 13, 2015, at 10:00
7
a.m., in the unrelated case of Camacho v. Jefferson Capital, CAND Case No. 5:14-CV-02728-BLF-
8
HRL. Thus, the Court’s continuance of the initial Case Management Conference in this matter to
9
March 13, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., has created a calendar conflict for Plaintiff’s counsel.
10
5.
11
12
Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court continue the Case
Management Conference currently set for March 13, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., to March 27, 2015, at 10:30
13
a.m. The parties further request that the deadline to file a Case Management Conference Statement be
14
continued from March 6, 2015, to March 20, 2015.
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16
CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.
17
18
Dated: March 2, 2015
19
20
By: /s/ Raeon R. Roulston
Raeon R. Roulston, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
DEREK BRANDON PICARD
21
WEISBERG & MILLER
22
23
24
Dated: March 2, 2015
25
26
27
28
2
By: /s/ Kenneth J. Sperandio, Jr.
Kenneth J. Sperandio, Jr., Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
Doc. 22.
-2STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 5:14-CV-04618-RMW-HRL
[] OR ER
1
2
3
4
5
6
Having considered the parties’ Stipulation and Joint Request to the Continue Case Management
Conference to March 27, 2015, and good cause appearing, the parties’ request is hereby GRANTED.
The Case Management Conference in this case is hereby continued to March 27, 2015, at 10:30 a.m.
The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before March 20, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
Dated:
The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 5:14-CV-04618-RMW-HRL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?