Picard v. ABC Legal Services, Inc. et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER 23 to Continue Case Management Conference: Case Management Conference set for 3/27/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/6/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575) Raeon R. Roulston (SBN 255622) CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC. 12 South First Street, Suite 1014 San Jose, California 95113-2418 Telephone Number: (408) 294-6100 Facsimile Number: (408) 294-6190 Email Address: fred.schwinn@sjconsumerlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff DEREK BRANDON PICARD 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10 DEREK BRANDON PICARD, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 15 16 17 Defendants. 18 20 21 STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [] OR ER ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC., a Washington corporation, MARCOS ANTONIO TEJADA, individually and in his official capacity; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 14 19 Case No. 5:14-CV-04618-RMW-HRL The parties in the above-entitled action hereby submit this Stipulation and Joint Request to Continue Case Management Conference regarding the Case Management Conference scheduled on March 13, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. In support of their request, the parties state as follows: 22 1. 23 this matter for March 6, 2015.1 24 2. 25 26 27 28 On December 10, 2014, the Court set the initial Case Management Conference in The firm Consumer Law Center, Inc., counsel for record for Plaintiff, employs two attorneys – Fred W. Schwinn, and Raeon R. Roulston. Lead counsel, Mr. Schwinn, will be traveling out of the state on a previously-scheduled vacation from March 6, 2015, to March 20, 2015. Thus, his 1 Doc. 16. -1STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 5:14-CV-04618-RMW-HRL 1 associate, Mr. Roulston, was assigned to appear for Plaintiff at the initial Case Management Conference 2 in this matter, which was originally scheduled on March 6, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. 3 4 5 3. Thereafter, on February 20, 2015, the Court, of its own accord, continued the said Case Management Conference to March 13, 2015.2 4. 6 Mr. Roulston is also scheduled to attend a Mediation on March 13, 2015, at 10:00 7 a.m., in the unrelated case of Camacho v. Jefferson Capital, CAND Case No. 5:14-CV-02728-BLF- 8 HRL. Thus, the Court’s continuance of the initial Case Management Conference in this matter to 9 March 13, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., has created a calendar conflict for Plaintiff’s counsel. 10 5. 11 12 Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court continue the Case Management Conference currently set for March 13, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., to March 27, 2015, at 10:30 13 a.m. The parties further request that the deadline to file a Case Management Conference Statement be 14 continued from March 6, 2015, to March 20, 2015. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC. 17 18 Dated: March 2, 2015 19 20 By: /s/ Raeon R. Roulston Raeon R. Roulston, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff DEREK BRANDON PICARD 21 WEISBERG & MILLER 22 23 24 Dated: March 2, 2015 25 26 27 28 2 By: /s/ Kenneth J. Sperandio, Jr. Kenneth J. Sperandio, Jr., Esq. Attorney for Defendant ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC. Doc. 22. -2STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 5:14-CV-04618-RMW-HRL [] OR ER 1 2 3 4 5 6 Having considered the parties’ Stipulation and Joint Request to the Continue Case Management Conference to March 27, 2015, and good cause appearing, the parties’ request is hereby GRANTED. The Case Management Conference in this case is hereby continued to March 27, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before March 20, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 5:14-CV-04618-RMW-HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?