Ramos et al v. Ramos et al

Filing 97

JUDGMENT Because further amendment would be futile, leave to amend is denied. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 18, 2016. (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016) Modified on 4/18/2016 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JENNIFER G. RAMOS, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 JUDGMENT v. 9 10 THOMAS G. RAMOS, et al., Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 5:14-cv-04713-PSG 12 13 The court has granted Defendants Thomas G. Ramos and Helen R. Instrella and Timothy 14 G. Caoile’s motions to dismiss, and severed the case against remaining Defendant Patricia Ramos 15 Fabros.1 Because further amendment would be futile, leave to amend is denied.2 The Clerk shall 16 close the file. 17 SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: April 18, 2016 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 25 See Docket No. 89. 2 26 27 28 See id. at 9; Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Team Equip., Inc., 741 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2014) (“A complaint should not be dismissed without leave to amend unless amendment would be futile.” (citing McQuillion v. Schwarzenneger, 369 F.3d 1091, 1099 (9th Cir. 2004))). 1 Case No. 5:14-cv-04713-PSG JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?