Ramos et al v. Ramos et al

Filing 97

JUDGMENT Because further amendment would be futile, leave to amend is denied. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 18, 2016. (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016) Modified on 4/18/2016 (cv, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JENNIFER G. RAMOS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8

JUDGMENT

v.

9
10

THOMAS G. RAMOS, et al.,
Defendants.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 5:14-cv-04713-PSG

12
13

The court has granted Defendants Thomas G. Ramos and Helen R. Instrella and Timothy

14

G. Caoile’s motions to dismiss, and severed the case against remaining Defendant Patricia Ramos

15

Fabros.1 Because further amendment would be futile, leave to amend is denied.2 The Clerk shall

16

close the file.

17

SO ORDERED.

18

Dated: April 18, 2016
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
1

25

See Docket No. 89.

2

26
27
28

See id. at 9; Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Team Equip., Inc., 741 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2014)
(“A complaint should not be dismissed without leave to amend unless amendment would be
futile.” (citing McQuillion v. Schwarzenneger, 369 F.3d 1091, 1099 (9th Cir. 2004))).
1
Case No. 5:14-cv-04713-PSG
JUDGMENT