Katsch v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Filing
15
ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/10/2014. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL KATSCH,
Case No. 5:14-cv-04730 HRL
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED
TO A DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
13
14
15
16
17
JPMORGAN CHASE, a Delaware Limited
Liability Company and DOES 1 through 25,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73-1, all
18
parties were required to file, no later than November 5, 2014, either (1) a Consent to Proceed
19
Before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge
20
and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. Despite reminders from the
21
court, not all parties have done so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Clerk of the Court
22
shall reassign this case to a District Judge. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636; Civ. L.R. 73-1.
23
Dated: November 10, 2014
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
2
3
5:14-cv-04730-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
George Elonge Akwo
george@galawgroup.org
Nathan Randall Jaskowiak
nathan.jaskowiak@kyl.com, mary.land@kyl.com
4
5
Philip Alan McLeod
philip.mcleod@kyl.com, maricel.schilt@kyl.com
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?