Zenaida Bose v. Virgil Valin et al
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DISMISS CASE Re: Dkt. No. 24 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/16/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ZENAIDA BOSE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
Case No.14-cv-04744-NC
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO
DISMISS CASE
v.
VIRGIL VALIN, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 24
Defendants.
15
16
17
Plaintiffs Zenaida Bose and Florentino Sabug request that the Court dismiss their
18
Fair Labor Standards Act case against defendants Virgil Valin, Amor Valid, Lassenpark
19
Residential Hall, Lassenpark Villa, and Sunrise RCFE, Inc. with prejudice. All parties
20
have now consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. Nos. 7, 25. The Court
21
GRANTS plaintiffs’ request and retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement through
22
February 28, 2016.
23
Having reviewed the settlement agreement, Dkt. No. 27, as well as plaintiffs’
24
counsels’ declaration describing the case’s potential value with attorneys’ fees and costs
25
($100,000), Dkt. No. 26, the Court finds the agreement terms ($36,000 settlement amount)
26
to be a “fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute” and dismisses the case. See
27
Luo v. Zynga Inc., No. 13-cv-00186 NC, 2014 WL 457742, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2014)
28
(internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
Case No.:14-cv-04744-NC
1
2
3
4
The Court dismisses the case with prejudice and orders the clerk to terminate
Case No. 14-cv-4744.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 16, 2015
5
_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.:14-cv-04744-NC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?