PHD Research Group, Inc. v. Asetek, A/S et al

Filing 43

ORDER GRANTING 42 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by PHD Research Group, Inc. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/10/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KRIS S. LE FAN (No. 278611) Email: kris@lowelaw.com LOWE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 640 Los Angeles, California 90064 Telephone: 310/477-5811 Facsimile: 310/477-7672 Attorneys for Plaintiff PHD RESEARCH GROUP, a Florida corporation 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) ) ) PHD RESEARCH GROUP, a Florida ) Corporation, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) vs. ) ) ASETEK, A/S, a foreign corporation and ASETEK USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) ) Defendant(s). Case Number: C 14-04753 EJD NOTICE OF STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER 18 19 JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 20 Plaintiff PHD Research Group and Defendants Asetek, A/S and Asetek USA, Inc., (the 21 22 "Parties") filed a Notice of Settlement and a Stipulation to Stay Proceedings on February 24, 23 2015 (Dkt. #39). On February 25, 2015, the Court vacated all pretrial deadlines and terminated 24 all pending motions. Dkt. # 41. In addition, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause for the 25 Parties to explain why the case should not be dismissed and provided that the Order to Show 26 Cause shall be automatically vacated if the Parties file a stipulated dismissal prior to May 14, 27 28 2015. Page 1 of 4 The Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of 1 2 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, jointly stipulate that all claims and counterclaims in this 3 case are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice. Each party shall be responsible for their own 4 attorneys’ fees and costs. 5 I declare under penalty of perjury that Defendants' counsel, Lily Lim of Finnegan, 6 7 8 Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, has indicated to me her consent to filing this pleading. 9 10 Dated this 8th day of April, 2015. 11 12 Respectfully submitted, 13 14 15 16 17 KRIS S. LE FAN (No. 278611) Email: kris@lowelaw.com LOWE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 640 Los Angeles, California 90064 Telephone: 310/477-5811 Facsimile: 310/477-7672 ROBERT F. McCAULEY (No. 162056) Email: robert.mccauley@finnegan.com LILY LIM (No. 214536) Email: lily.lim@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 Telephone: 650/849-6600 Facsimile: 650/849-6666 Attorneys for Defendants ASETEK, A/S and ASETEK USA, INC. 18 19 By: /s/ Kris S. Le Fan 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 And By: ROBERT L. WOLTER (Pro Hac Vice) Florida Bar No.: 0906344 BEUSSE WOLTER SANKS & MAIRE, P.A. 390 North Orange Avenue Suite 2500 Orlando, Florida 32801 Telephone: (407) 926-7700 Email: rwolter@iplawfl.com Attorneys for Plaintiff PHD RESEARCH GROUP Page 2 of 4 /s/ Lily Lim 1 2 3 4 5 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been filed utilizing the CM ECF system this 8th day of April, 2015. /s/ Kris S. Le Fan Attorney 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 4 ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, it is: 3 ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims in this case are DISMISSED in their 4 entirety with prejudice. The February 25, 2015 Order to Show Cause (Dkt. #41) is VACATED 5 and the Parties are relieved of the obligation to file a joint statement. All other pretrial deadlines 6 7 8 9 and hearing dates are VACATED, and any pending motions are TERMINATED. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close this file. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 14 Dated: 4/10/2015 UNITED STATES JUDGE Edward J. Davila 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?