Altera Corporation v. Papst Licensing GMBH & Co.KG

Filing 23

Order by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman denying 22 Motion to Relate Case. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2015)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN JOSE DIVISION

6
7

ALTERA CORPORATION,

Case No. 14-cv-04794-BLF

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,
Defendant.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
STIPULATED MOTION TO RELATE
CASES
[Re: ECF 22]

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Plaintiff Altera Corporation moves to relate the above-captioned case with another case,

14

Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, 14-cv-4963-RS. All parties to both actions

15

stipulate that the cases are related. See ECF 22-1 at 2.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The Court, however, DENIES Plaintiff’s request to relate the cases because the
undersigned would be forced to recuse herself in Xilinx.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 13, 2015
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge