Prater v. Goodwin et al

Filing 73

INTERIM ORDER re 47 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 54 , 55 plaintiff's discovery dispute reports. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/15/2015. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 CHRISTOPHER KYLE PRATER, 12 Case No. 5:14-cv-04876-HRL Plaintiff, 13 INTERIM ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY DISPUTE REPORTS v. 14 15 IRVIN GOODWIN, HVEHF VETERAN CENTER, 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff’s “Discovery Dispute Joint Report Number 3”1 seeks an order compelling 18 defendants to respond to plaintiff’s Interrogatories 1-17. As presented, however, the court is 19 unable to properly evaluate these interrogatories and all of defendants’ objections to them. 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff has merely purported to summarize the text of some interrogatories and defendants’ responses. No later than January 5, 2015, plaintiff shall submit to the court an actual copy of Interrogatories 1-17 he served on defendants, as well as a copy of the responses defendants served on him. Plaintiff shall submit this document without any further argument on this pending DDJR. Any such argument submitted in violation of this order will be stricken and will not be considered. 26 27 28 1 This is actually DDJR No. 4. However, to avoid further confusion, this court will refer to this DDJR as numbered by plaintiff. Plaintiff’s “Discovery Dispute Joint Report Number 4”2 seeks an order compelling 1 2 defendants to produce documents responsive to plaintiff’s Requests for Production 1-16. As 3 presented, the court is unable to properly evaluate these requests or defendants’ objections to 4 them. No later than January 5, 2015, plaintiff shall submit to the court an actual copy of the 5 Requests for Production 1-16 he served on defendants, as well as a copy of the responses 6 defendants served on him. Plaintiff shall submit this document without any further argument 7 on this pending DDJR. Any such argument submitted in violation of this order will be 8 stricken and will not be considered. SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: December 15, 2015 ________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 28 This is actually DDJR No. 5. However, to avoid further confusion, this court will refer to this DDJR as numbered by plaintiff. 2 1 2 5:14-cv-04876-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Christopher Kyle Prater kcprater74@gmail.com 3 Jennifer J. Capabianco jcapabianco@selmanbreitman.com, ttaylor@selmanbreitman.com 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?