SanDisk Corporation v. SK hynix Inc. et al

Filing 131

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 3/24/2015. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

9
10

SANDISK CORPORATION,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Plaintiff,

12
v.

13

Case No.:14-CV-04940-LHK
ORDER VACATING HEARING AND
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 52, 53, 75

SK HYNIX INC., et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16
17

Before the Court are three motions. Plaintiff SanDisk Corporation (“SanDisk”) has filed a

18

motion to remand the instant case to Santa Clara County Superior Court. ECF No. 75. Defendants

19

SK Hynix, Inc., SK Hynix America, Inc., and SK Hynix Memory Solutions (collectively,

20

“Hynix”) have filed a motion to compel arbitration, ECF No. 53, as well as a motion to dismiss for

21

forum non conveniens, ECF No. 52. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds Hynix’s

22

motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens appropriate for

23

resolution without oral argument and hereby VACATES the hearing for these motions, currently

24

scheduled for March 26, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.1 The Court also VACATES the case management

25

conference, which is also scheduled for March 26, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.

26
1

27
28

On February 3, 2015, the Court vacated the hearing for SanDisk’s motion to remand, which was
scheduled for February 5, 2015. ECF No. 104.
1
Case No.: 14-CV-04940-LHK
ORDER VACATING HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

Dated: March 24, 2015

3
4

______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 14-CV-04940-LHK
ORDER VACATING HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE