SN Servicing Corporation v. Western Bancorp

Filing 43

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: NECESSARY PARTY. SN Servicing must explain why Seneca Mortgaging Services, LLC is not a necessary party in this action by 8/17/2015. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/11/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SN SERVICING CORPORATION, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Plaintiff, 12 Case No.14-cv-04978-NC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: NECESSARY PARTY v. 13 WESTERN BANCORP, 14 Defendant. 15 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ August 10, 2015, joint case management 17 statement. Dkt. No. 42. Defendant Western Bancorp suggests that non-party Seneca 18 Mortgaging Services, LLC is the injured party, not SN Servicing Corporation. 19 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 19(a) provides, 20 (1) Required Party. A person who is subject to service of process and whose 21 joinder will not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction must be 22 joined as a party if: 23 (A) in that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among 24 existing parties; or 25 (B) that person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is 26 so situated that disposing of the action in the person's absence may: 27 (i) as a practical matter impair or impede the person's ability to protect 28 the interest; or Case No.:14-cv-04978-NC 1 (ii) leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring 2 double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the 3 interest. 4 Additionally, the Ninth Circuit interprets Rule 19 to require joinder even when there 5 is no cause of action between plaintiff and a party sought to be joined. E.E.O.C. v. 6 Peabody W. Coal Co., 400 F.3d 774, 781 (9th Cir. 2005). If “[j]oinder is necessary for the 7 ‘sole purpose’ of effecting complete relief between the parties,” then the Court must order 8 joinder of the required party. Id. at 781. 9 Therefore, SN Servicing must explain why Seneca Mortgaging Services, LLC is not a necessary party in this action by August 17, 2015. If Western Bancorp wishes, it may 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 also explain by August 17, 2015, why it would support or oppose court-ordered joinder of 12 Seneca Mortgaging Services, LLC. The parties should be prepared to discuss the issue 13 further at the August 19, 2015, case management conference. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 Dated: August 11, 2015 18 _____________________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.:14-cv-04978-NC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?