SN Servicing Corporation v. Western Bancorp
Filing
43
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: NECESSARY PARTY. SN Servicing must explain why Seneca Mortgaging Services, LLC is not a necessary party in this action by 8/17/2015. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/11/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SN SERVICING CORPORATION,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Plaintiff,
12
Case No.14-cv-04978-NC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
NECESSARY PARTY
v.
13
WESTERN BANCORP,
14
Defendant.
15
16
The Court has reviewed the parties’ August 10, 2015, joint case management
17
statement. Dkt. No. 42. Defendant Western Bancorp suggests that non-party Seneca
18
Mortgaging Services, LLC is the injured party, not SN Servicing Corporation.
19
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 19(a) provides,
20
(1) Required Party. A person who is subject to service of process and whose
21
joinder will not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction must be
22
joined as a party if:
23
(A) in that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among
24
existing parties; or
25
(B) that person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is
26
so situated that disposing of the action in the person's absence may:
27
(i) as a practical matter impair or impede the person's ability to protect
28
the interest; or
Case No.:14-cv-04978-NC
1
(ii) leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring
2
double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the
3
interest.
4
Additionally, the Ninth Circuit interprets Rule 19 to require joinder even when there
5
is no cause of action between plaintiff and a party sought to be joined. E.E.O.C. v.
6
Peabody W. Coal Co., 400 F.3d 774, 781 (9th Cir. 2005). If “[j]oinder is necessary for the
7
‘sole purpose’ of effecting complete relief between the parties,” then the Court must order
8
joinder of the required party. Id. at 781.
9
Therefore, SN Servicing must explain why Seneca Mortgaging Services, LLC is not
a necessary party in this action by August 17, 2015. If Western Bancorp wishes, it may
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
also explain by August 17, 2015, why it would support or oppose court-ordered joinder of
12
Seneca Mortgaging Services, LLC. The parties should be prepared to discuss the issue
13
further at the August 19, 2015, case management conference.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dated: August 11, 2015
18
_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.:14-cv-04978-NC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?