Gizzarelli v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 20

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Having reviewed the parties' joint statement and good cause appearing therefor, the hearing on the Order to Show Cause scheduled for June 4, 2015, is CONTINUED to 10:00 a.m. on July 2, 2015. On or before June 25, 2015, the parties shall file an updated joint statement in response to the Order to Show Cause setting forth the status of the settlement and amount of additional time necessary to finalize and file a dismissal. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/29/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 EDUARDO GIZZARELLI, Case No. 5:14-cv-05176-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 10 11 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Having reviewed the parties’ joint statement (Docket Item No. 19) and good cause 14 appearing therefor, the hearing on the Order to Show Cause scheduled for June 4, 2015, is 15 CONTINUED to 10:00 a.m. on July 2, 2015. On or before June 25, 2015, the parties shall file 16 an updated joint statement in response to the Order to Show Cause setting forth the status of the 17 settlement and amount of additional time necessary to finalize and file a dismissal. 18 The Order to Show Cause shall be automatically vacated and the parties relieved of the 19 obligation to file a joint statement if a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure 41(a) is filed on or before June 25, 2015. 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 29, 2015 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:14-cv-05176-EJD ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?