Romero v. Flowers Bakeries, LLC

Filing 40

ORDER APPROVING 39 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 8/20/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/27/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 6/25/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2015)

Download PDF
1 Jennifer S. Romano (CSB No. 195953) jromano@crowell.com 2 3 4 CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 622-4750 Facsimile: (213) 622-2690 5 6 7 8 9 10 Joel D. Smith (CSB No. 244902) jsmith@crowell.com Rebecca M. Suarez (CSB No. 284853) rsuarez@crowell.com CROWELL & MORING LLP 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.986.2800 Facsimile: 415.986.2827 11 Attorneys for FLOWERS BAKERIES, LLC 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 KELLY ROMERO, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 Case No. 5:14-cv-05189 v. FLOWERS BAKERIES, LLC dba NATURE’S OWN, a Georgia limited liability company, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING JULY 9, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND JULY 16, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW Case No. 5:14-cv-05189 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Kelly Romero and 2 Defendant Flowers Bakeries, LLC (“Flowers”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby 3 stipulate as follows: 4 5 6 WHEREAS, on May 6, 2015, the Court granted in part and denied in part Flowers’ motion to dismiss the original complaint in this action. (Doc. No. 35.) WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties and this Court’s June 3, 2015 7 Order approving the stipulation, the deadline to file Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) 8 is July 6, 2015. (Doc. No. 38.) 9 10 11 WHEREAS, the parties’ joint Case Management Statement is due July 9, 2015 and the Initial Case Management Conference is scheduled for July 16, 2015. (Doc. No. 36.) WHEREAS, Flowers anticipates that it will likely respond to the FAC by filing another 12 motion to dismiss or stay the action (subject to an analysis of the allegations in the FAC after it is 13 filed). In addition, counsel for Flowers has a scheduling conflict with the currently scheduled 14 July 16, 2015 Case Management Conference. 15 THEREFORE, Flowers and Ms. Romero stipulate and respectfully request that the Court 16 continue the Case Management Statement to Thursday, August 20, 2015, and the Case 17 Management Conference to Thursday, August 27, 2015, or as soon thereafter as the Court may 18 designate. 19 20 Dated: June 24, 2015 CROWELL & MORING, LLP By: 21 Joel D. Smith Attorneys for Defendant Flowers Bakeries, LLC 22 23 24 25 26 27 /s/ Joel D. Smith Dated: June 24, 2015 COUNSELONE, P.C. By: /s/ Anthony Orshansky Anthony Orshansky Attorneys for Plaintiff Kelly Romero 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW 1 Case No. 5:14-cv-05189 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 [PROPOSED ORDER] PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, 3 4 Date: June 25, 2015 Hon. Beth Labson Freeman United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 I, Joel D. Smith, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 25 document. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the 26 filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 27 By: /s/ Joel D. Smith Joel D. Smith 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW 2 Case No. 5:14-cv-05189 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?