Galinato et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 26

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The parties have not filed a joint statement or a stipulated dismissal. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/10/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

SAN JOSE DIVISION

7
8

ANGELITO GALINATO, et al.,

Case No. 5:14-cv-05198-EJD

Plaintiffs,
9

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v.
10
11

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13

On June 12, 2015, the court issued an order to show cause why this case should not be

14

dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) after the parties filed a Notice of

15

Settlement. See Docket Item No. 25. The court ordered the parties to file, on or before August 6,

16

2015, either a stipulated dismissal or a joint statement setting forth the status of settlement efforts,

17

and notified the parties that failure to comply with any part of the order would be deemed

18

sufficient grounds to dismiss the action.

19

As of this time, the parties have not filed a joint statement or a stipulated dismissal.

20

Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to

21

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall close this file.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 10, 2015
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28

1
Case No.: 5:14-cv-05198-EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE