Stewart v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 33

ORDER granting Motion to Continue Stay. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on April 26, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (88625) NORA FRIMANN, Assistant City Attorney (93249) CHRISTIAN B. NIELSEN, Chief Deputy City Attorney (87972) SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (188509) Office of the City Attorney 200 East Santa Clara Street, 16th Floor San José, California 95113-1905 Telephone Number: (408) 535-1900 Facsimile Number: (408) 998-3131 E-Mail Address: cao.main@sanjoseca.gov Attorneys for Defendants: MICHAEL L. PORTER and PETER A SZEMEREDI JOHN L. BURRIS (69888) DeWITT M. LACY (258789) The Law Offices of John L. Burris Airport Corporate Center 7677 Oakport St., Suite 1120 Oakland, CA 94621 Telephone Number: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile Number: (510) 839-3882 dewitt.lacy@johnburrislaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff: MARCUS ALAN STEWART 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 MARCUS ALAN STEWART, an individual, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL L. PORTER, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department; PETER A. SZEMEREDI, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department; DOES 110, inclusive, individually and in their capacities as officers for the San Jose Police Department, Case Number: 14-CV-05235 LHK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING OUTCOME OF CRIMINAL MATTER Defendants. The parties are reporting back to the court following the court’s order of January 28, 2016 continuing the stay and prior to the Case Management Conference currently set for 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING OUTCOME OF CRIMINAL MATTER Case Number: 14-CV-05235 1310573.doc 1 2 May 4, 2016. The parties ask the court to continue the stay of proceedings for another 45 days. 3 Plaintiff’s state court criminal case has not resolved and is currently set for trial on May 16, 4 2016 It is anticipated that some form of resolution of the criminal case will occur by the 5 end of the first week of June 2016. 6 Defendants’ counsel is unavailable from June 9, 2016 through June 20, 2016 and 7 request that the continued Case Management Conference be rescheduled to a date no 8 earlier than June 21, 2016. 9 Respectfully submitted, 10 11 Dated: April 26, 2016 12 RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney By: _ /s/ Shannon Smyth-Mendoza______ SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA Senior Deputy City Attorney 13 14 Attorneys for Defendants: MICHAEL L. PORTER and PETER A SZEMEREDI 15 16 17 Dated: April 26, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS By: ___/s/ DeWitt M. Lacy___________ DEWITT M. LACY 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff: MARCUS ALAN STEWART 20 21 22 23 24 I attest that Plaintiff’s counsel has read and approved this document, and given consent to the filing of the same with the Court. Respectfully submitted, Dated: April 26, 2016 RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney 25 26 27 28 By: _ /s/ Shannon Smyth-Mendoza______ SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA Senior Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants: MICHAEL L. PORTER and PETER A SZEMEREDI 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING OUTCOME OF CRIMINAL MATTER Case Number: 14-CV-05235 1310573.doc ORDER 1 2 Good cause appearing the Court orders the entire civil action is stayed for an additional 3 45 day period subject to an extension that will be based on information provided by law 4 enforcement or Plaintiff’s counsel in the criminal matter. The parties are ordered to return to 5 2 p.m. June 29, 2016 Court on ______________ at _____ a.m./p.m. 6 7 8 April 26, 2016 Dated ___________________ ______________________________ HON. LUCY H. KOH United States District Court Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING OUTCOME OF CRIMINAL MATTER Case Number: 14-CV-05235 1310573.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?